- May 3, 2010
- 4,485
- 4,554
- 21,180
Jagartrott said:I would love it if a GC contender put his team at the front the last 40 km and then attack on the descent. If your good at going downhill, you should use this weapon at every opportunity. Plus, if you take the lead, you're much less in danger of crashing because of someone else.
Carols said:Cycling is a sport for hard men. The normal 3km rule is good, I've seen to many people lose jerseys etc when it was 1km. But it's an outdoor sport and aside from truly unusual weather or really dangerous conditions just let them Ride! That's my 2 cents.
RedheadDane said:What I'm suggesting is that… yes... everyone of course has the right to go to the front? But do they have to? Why not let the guys who know how take the lead? Might minimise the risk.
Besides; maybe the non-descenders just need to accept that they might lose time on the descends and then just take it back on the climbs.
For me the problem wouldn't so much be Nibali attacking on the descend (then he wouldn't be mixed in with all the other teams) but a rider like, say… Lopez... telling his team to go to the front, even though he might not be the best descender.
Essentially what I'm saying is that riders should be aware of what they're good at - and use that to their advantage - but also what they're bad at.
SafeBet said:I'm not sure what you guys have heard, but from what I understand the only decision the jury has made thus far is to apply the 3km rule, as if this was a standard sprint stage.
Armchair cyclist said:SafeBet said:I'm not sure what you guys have heard, but from what I understand the only decision the jury has made thus far is to apply the 3km rule, as if this was a standard sprint stage.
And that is not really a decision, because, if I understand correctly, that is automatically applicable unless there is a classified climb within the last 3 km.
fuiers said:I love this guy in the maglia Azzurra.