Re:
Ok, i was already excited to see some proper laps of this Andermatt system of cols. If Nufenen+Gottard+Furka is real then i'm more than excited as i felt Grimsel north was a bit too long and draggy for my taste. I'm more of a gradient guy myself.
roundabout said:
How can it be harder than the original, when the original stage was longer and had more climbing?
Original 3900 meters and 140km
New 3000 meters and 100km
I would argue it's about the quality of the climbs (combination of length and gradient) rather than just accumulated cimbing meters. Like eg. Cervinia climb has more distance and climbing but it's mostly 7% with a lot of false-flats. In the same valley you can find Colle San Carlo (the one where Carapaz won the KOM, stage and later Giro) which has less distance and climbing yet it's entirely at 9-10%. You can assume San Carlo will have a larger impact on the race than Cervinia.
In the Suisse case i think it's not as extreme. New climbs don't have the distance but overally higher gradient. Also placing the hardest climb at the beginning (Nufenen is a very good climb) should bring a lot of damage to the doms and there's not much flat in between to catch up while the last design had long, not too steep and not that difficult descends from Furka and Susten to catch up. The only place of respite are roughly 8km between Gottard and Furka. Also you cannot forget that half of Gottardpass is cobbled. I'm not sure how (relatively) big of an impact it may have. I guess it will still end up in Sky/Ineos Thomas the Tank Engine training.
Below are the profiles of Nufenen, Gottard and Furka for reference:
Interestingly, Bernal seems to be the only GC guy to be finishing relatively high in flat stages besides the Murten one. I know that the guy seems to have a near-Valverdesque sprinting capability but this may be some early form showing. We'll see today i guess.