Dream quartet over last 10 years?Not enough Communist countries for that.
The one true TTT has 4 riders and 100 kilometres.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Dream quartet over last 10 years?Not enough Communist countries for that.
The one true TTT has 4 riders and 100 kilometres.
Since it was in national teams, you'd need national quartets. For most potentially dominant quartet, therefore, it's almost impossible to see beyond a Wiggins-Froome-Thomas-? (Millar? Dowsett?) 2012 quartet. Australia would have the possibility to get some overlap between Dennis and Rogers, and then could get Porte and Turbo Durbo in to make a pretty sick team lineup too.Dream quartet over last 10 years?
Ganna, Wiggins, Martin, Van Aert.Dream quartet over last 10 years?
Belgium clearly better than Australia.Since it was in national teams, you'd need national quartets. For most potentially dominant quartet, therefore, it's almost impossible to see beyond a Wiggins-Froome-Thomas-? (Millar? Dowsett?) 2012 quartet. Australia would have the possibility to get some overlap between Dennis and Rogers, and then could get Porte and Turbo Durbo in to make a pretty sick team lineup too.
Germany?Since it was in national teams, you'd need national quartets. For most potentially dominant quartet, therefore, it's almost impossible to see beyond a Wiggins-Froome-Thomas-? (Millar? Dowsett?) 2012 quartet. Australia would have the possibility to get some overlap between Dennis and Rogers, and then could get Porte and Turbo Durbo in to make a pretty sick team lineup too.
So on a flat course, you would take them ahead of Van Aert, Evenepoel, Lampaert, Campenaerts?I'd take Pogacar, Roglic, Tratnik and Mohoric over everyone but the Brits.
Add any type of uphill on the route and might even take them over GB.
Ganna, Wiggins, Martin, Van Aert.
So on a flat course, you would take them ahead of Van Aert, Evenepoel, Lampaert, Campenaerts?
Freaky, my exact 4 as well if allowed to mix nationalities.Ganna, Wiggins, Martin, Van Aert
Cancellara, the prologue specialist? The only long ITT he excelled in during the eligible time period was the Rio TT (quite hilly).Maybe Cancellara instead of Ganna since 100km might be too long an effort for Ganna?
Cancellara, the prologue specialist? The only long ITT he excelled in during the eligible time period was the Rio TT (quite hilly).
Dream quartet over last 10 years?
Think BEX's good setup, balanced team and White's record in setting up TTT's with Orica could win them this, value at 8/1?
This is why I am not so quick to expect a win from Quickstep here. They’ll be top 5 but I expect a physically bigger team to win, especially in this shorter TT.If these were an aggregate of solo riders I would say QS.
I'm a bit clueless regarding this discipline but one of Evenepoel's big advantages is that he is so compact that when he attacks it's hard to get as much draft benefit, which is part of the reason he's good on shallow gradients. I recall him trying to leadout Jakobsen in some of the earlier races but it was like his long pulls at the end were almost too good and he was getting separation off the front/losing the man.
Would it be more the case that TTTs like this favour the bigger men with respect to draft benefit rather than Quickstep's smaller/good CDA riders? I just have the image in my head of early US Postal whipping everyone and all of looking about 10 feet tall when they crossed the line.
Think BEX's good setup, balanced team and White's record in setting up TTT's with Orica could win them this, value at 8/1?
Great point about rider size. Maybe not necessarily giants but similarly sized guys make for efficient drafting. I had the unfortunate duty of being behind the smallest, most compact/aero guy in a TTT with the other guys at 6'1" and 6'3". The shorter guy was very strong and got great recovery behind the monster dudes while I basically ended up taking a double pull each time with almost no recovery. We did OK but it was hard to walk after getting off the bike.If these were an aggregate of solo riders I would say QS.
I'm a bit clueless regarding this discipline but one of Evenepoel's big advantages is that he is so compact that when he attacks it's hard to get as much draft benefit, which is part of the reason he's good on shallow gradients. I recall him trying to leadout Jakobsen in some of the earlier races but it was like his long pulls at the end were almost too good and he was getting separation off the front/losing the man.
Would it be more the case that TTTs like this favour the bigger men with respect to draft benefit rather than Quickstep's smaller/good CDA riders? I just have the image in my head of early US Postal whipping everyone and all of looking about 10 feet tall when they crossed the line.
Think BEX's good setup, balanced team and White's record in setting up TTT's with Orica could win them this, value at 8/1?
If it's a technical parcours, smaller riders are at an advantage.This is why I am not so quick to expect a win from Quickstep here. They’ll be top 5 but I expect a physically bigger team to win, especially in this shorter TT.
Perhaps but I’m eagerly awaiting being proven wrong in a few hours.Van Wilder's mom cheering for Arensman during the warm-up as DSM passes by.
I think 7 out of 8 Quicksteppers are wearing the new TT5 aero helmets.
If it's a technical parcours, smaller riders are at an advantage.
Tour de Suisse, 2009, Bern. Do I need say more?Cancellara, the prologue specialist? The only long ITT he excelled in during the eligible time period was the Rio TT (quite hilly).