Now waiting for the bus.Vine is in the break too. Can't wait to see his meltdown after he gets forced to wait for Almeida.
Now waiting for the bus.Vine is in the break too. Can't wait to see his meltdown after he gets forced to wait for Almeida.
You can always say that the customers never pay the employees, but in most businesses that doesn't make the opinion of the costumers irrelevant for the workers.Indirectly means nothing. Teams pay the riders. How riders and teams interact is an industrial relations question. You pay nobody. What you think is irrelevant to the riders.
Why not neutralize the descent? Gaps at summit stand etc. They've done it before. Seems like there are some simple solutions here...Wow, the descent actually looks really bad, sounds reasonable to cancel it, but apparently cyclists will do terrible tactical decisions and will descend it as long as everything is easier.
have you actually ever interacted with Haig? I have and he’s a good guy and not a bum. If he did this want this climb cancelled this that was an error in judgement.Jack Haig apparantly wanted this climb cancelled.
Good thing he's getting dropped, what a bum.
(And yes, Im watching.....)
Mind you he was dressed for the north pole so maybe that didn't work out so well eitherNow waiting for the bus.
Not only do you not pay the riders, you aren’t even their employer’s customer.You can always say that the customers never pay the employees, but in most businesses that doesn't make the opinion of the costumers irrelevant for the workers.
He'll be Rohanbot again by the time this Giro ends.Dennis Rohan is still there. The Stelvio is approaching.
I'm unable to find the extreme weather protocol on UCI's homepage, but a quote on inrng.com:Adam Hansen: "To provide clarity from the riders' perspective, the weather conditions experienced during this year's Giro have been among the most intense. In response, the riders held a vote last night to invoke the extreme weather protocol."
If that is correctly quoted, then the protocol makes no provision for invoking the protocol on past weather. Does anyone have a copy of the entire protocol?the compulsory convening of a meeting between the stakeholders (organisation including race doctor and chief of security, riders, teams, President of the Commissaires Panel,) when extreme weather conditions are anticipated prior to the start of a stage
Technically, he did not want the climb cancelled, but the descent (which obviously implies that you cannot do the climb either).have you actually ever interacted with Haig? I have and he’s a good guy and not a bum. If he did this want this climb cancelled this that was an error in judgement.
I get that, but doesn’t mean the guys a bum. I wish the stage had gone as originally planned.Technically, he did not want the climb cancelled, but the descent (which obviously implies that you cannot do the climb either).
The number of links in the value chain is not what matters. What matters is how actions in one end affect those in the other.Not only do you not pay the riders, you aren’t even their employer’s customer.
Wow, you're lucky you're not an Evenepoel fan if you get worked up over that comment, lol.I get that, but doesn’t mean the guys a bum. I wish the stage had gone as originally planned.
I don't think he is a bum. I think cancelling the descent seems more reasonable than the change that was made.I get that, but doesn’t mean the guys a bum. I wish the stage had gone as originally planned.
Remco would take 5 minute, Giro overWhy didn't they start the Giro with this stage?