- Feb 20, 2012
- 53,944
- 44,328
- 28,180
They compromised on avoiding rain and riding the dangerous descent anyway.I mean in future. The sport is becoming more focussed on rider safety, even if there's a tug of war at the moment, and that's likely to continue. If top riders think they're going to be forced into constantly racing in conditions they deem dangerous, they're going to stop turning up. Without those riders, and maybe their teams, I don't think the Giro would survive.
And clearly there is inbetween ground between 'we don't care if you get hurt/sick' and 'you get to choose if you want to race what we design' that needs to be found, and I think being proactive and cutting the bits people don't care about would be preferable to what's happening now where a raceable stage is chopped because riders are fed up.
"Rider safety" is always a convenient excuse to avoid racing the parts you don't wanna race. As a general rule, hard mountain stages favor only a small minority of teams, so a majority will always want to skip it.
I have 0 sympathy for "rider safety" concerns, when they always happen on the morning of or after a stage and when we're still calling every big crash induced by stupid, dangerous behavior a "racing incident"
