I do like the idea, but it seems that there might be some danger that the lead group and the Grupetto meet each other.I just read an article suggesting that the Loze stage wouldn't just climb the last 1 kilometer to Courchevel Altiport after the descent, but would descent all the way back and doing the climb used in 2005 when Valverde won. That would look a bit like this (Just the last two climbs then): https://ridewithgps.com/routes/41289259
![]()
Medier: Vanvidsbjerg vender tilbage til Tour de France
"En af de hårdeste stigninger" i Tour de France-historien skal muligvis atter besøges i 2023.www.feltet.dk
I do like the idea, but it seems that there might be some danger that the lead group and the Grupetto meet each other.
I do like the idea, but it seems that there might be some danger that the lead group and the Grupetto meet each other.
Also an idea to better link climbs: There is a parallel and higher mountain pass to the Roseland, called Cormet d'Arêches. The descent of that pass would directly link to the part of the valley Tarantaise, where on both sides a mountain road starts, which both don't finish far away from the Col de la Loze. So my question is, would the Cormet d'Arêches be an option the ride on (especially to descent)? Idea would be:
Cormet d'Arêches - Hautecour (or Col du Tra) - Col de la Loze without a lot of flat in between.
I do like the idea, but it seems that there might be some danger that the lead group and the Grupetto meet each other.
Also an idea to better link climbs: There is a parallel and higher mountain pass to the Roseland, called Cormet d'Arêches. The descent of that pass would directly link to the part of the valley Tarantaise, where on both sides a mountain road starts, which both don't finish far away from the Col de la Loze. So my question is, would the Cormet d'Arêches be an option the ride on (especially to descent)? Idea would be:
Cormet d'Arêches - Hautecour (or Col du Tra) - Col de la Loze without a lot of flat in between.
Not sure if the west side of Loze is safe enough to descend by ASO standards though, the bike path part is really steep and irregular and has very few hairpins to slow the riders down - in fact, the first 2.5 kilometres have zero curves that are more than ~45° - and it's mostly unprotected.Sounds like a great idea, but a bit of a logistic nightmare with the big Tour caravan...
See, stage before nothing good will happenThe stage before is a sprint.
LE TOUR - A Bayonne, Dax, Mont-de-Marsan, Nogaro, Laruns, Pau, Tarbes et Cauterets ?
Après un départ depuis Bilbao, le 1er juillet, la Grande Boucle passera 5 jours sur le bassin Adour Gascogne. Verdict officiel le jeudi 27 octobre.presselib.com
Stage 6 is the Pau - Laruns stage, so they actually got it right.
Cormet d´Areches is absolutely unfeasable with a road bike.I do like the idea, but it seems that there might be some danger that the lead group and the Grupetto meet each other.
Also an idea to better link climbs: There is a parallel and higher mountain pass to the Roseland, called Cormet d'Arêches. The descent of that pass would directly link to the part of the valley Tarantaise, where on both sides a mountain road starts, which both don't finish far away from the Col de la Loze. So my question is, would the Cormet d'Arêches be an option the ride on (especially to descent)? Idea would be:
Cormet d'Arêches - Hautecour (or Col du Tra) - Col de la Loze without a lot of flat in between.
For the stage to Cautarets or Pont d'Espagne: do we believe they tackle Aspin and Tourmalet before the final climb, or is it possible to have more or even less climbs on the route?
So it seems like Stage 17 is going to be the ITT (one and only?). The two towns are what 9 k apart? Are they seriously going to have a race with only a 10 k ITT? I guess you can expand it by having a loop around Sallanches but still, that'll make it what a 12 K ITT?
2015 Tour also had two starts and finishes cramped together in the same area (Sallanches, Megeve, Saint Gervais and Megeve again).a complete spaghetti around Saint Gervais with stages. Never happend before I guess that stage finishes and starts layed that close together and that travel distance between the stages has been this limited.
Which genius at ASO mixed up the TT for the women's race with the one for the men's race? The one year they seem to have put the mountain stages in a decent order also seems to be the year they produce the most unbalanced route in their history...So it seems like Stage 17 is going to be the ITT (one and only?). The two towns are what 9 k apart? Are they seriously going to have a race with only a 10 k ITT? I guess you can expand it by having a loop around Sallanches but still, that'll make it what a 12 K ITT?
But chances of a TTT are not that high anymore.
a complete spaghetti around Saint Gervais with stages. Never happend before I guess that stage finishes and starts layed that close together and that travel distance between the stages has been this limited.
Maybe for a road stage you could include all three countries. In Stage 16 of 2009 They started in Switzerland, went through Italy and Finished in Bourg-Saint-Maurice. In total 159km. The Shortest possible route one could do including all three countries would involve going from the French/Swiss Border through the Mont Blanc Tunnel to Courmayeur in Italy. This route would be just shy of 40km. Alternatively they could go from the Swiss/French border to top of the Grand St.Bernard Pass at the Italian/Swiss Border. In Total 62km with a 30km Mountain that climbs to 2400 metres. I imagine for the 2022 Stage 16 (ITT) course they could easily make it 30-35km rolling route that would be akin to the Final Time Trial of 2013. There are quite a few nice paved roads in behind Passy that would additionally add some nice gradients. I hope they don't screw the TT's up again. My faith in the Tour Organization is limited though in this regard.I mean even if they find a way to climb a mountain, even the MITT that Pog won had 30 k of flat, didn't it? It was like 30k of flat and 7 k of climbing. Now could you imagine an ITT that crosses into three countries? With that location you could have a ITT that goes from France to Switzerland to Italy back into France. Now that would be a cool ITT.
Col du sabot would be a more exciting dream in my point of view.Cormet d´Areches is absolutely unfeasable with a road bike.
One time they should really do a queen stage from Chamonix to Bourg St.Maurice (or vicinity) via Grand Bernard and Petit Bernard via San Carlo.2015 Tour also had two starts and finishes cramped together in the same area (Sallanches, Megeve, Saint Gervais and Megeve again).
One time they should really do a queen stage from Chamonix to Bourg St.Maurice (or vicinity) via Grand Bernard and Petit Bernard via San Carlo.
Why would that matter? What difference would it make for the start of finish host if the stage was like the previous to Bourg St. Maurice?No host cities would pay for that, I think. With the start and finish in France and most of the rest of the stage abroad.