3rd June: Criterium du Dauphiné stage 1, 5.7km

Page 19 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
cineteq said:
Placing is irrelevant.

WIGGINS Bradley 1 SKY PROCYCLING 00:06:40 00:00:01
EVANS Cadel 11 BMC RACING TEAM 00:06:44 00:00:06
NIBALI Vincenzo 81 LIQUIGAS-CANNONDALE 00:06:49 00:00:10

I'm surprised you made such an amateurish comment :rolleyes:
it's 5km :rolleyes: ofcourse the differences are very small. 10 seconds on 5km still means he lost 2 seconds per km :rolleyes: and almost 1 second per km on Evans
You clearly lack every form of perspective

But I guess distance is irrelevant to you as well. LOL
 
Apr 10, 2011
4,818
0
0
Very happy. Means Sky will have to do much less work and concentrate on the moutnains rather than defending the yellow.
 
Aug 29, 2011
3,701
2,090
16,680
Dekker_Tifosi said:
You name 1 bad one. I'll name a few good ones once CQ is back up (wielersite is too much of a hassle).

The better ones seem to be from before he became a GT rider though.
 
Dekker_Tifosi said:
? JvdB actually did much better prologues than that. Unlike his long ITT's his prologues where almost always very good.

This is actually one of his slower prologues.
Too bad CQ is down or I would have posted some examples :(




No no and no, see above. Long ITT will tell us more. Like I said JvdB has done better prologues.

lol, not really. He has never sucked as much at prologues, that's true. But to say he did "much better" would insinuate he ever came close enough to winning one (and i'm talking about the last 4 to 5 years). And my remark was first and foremost based on his statement that he wouldn't be "up there" in the Dauphiné.
 
May 25, 2010
8,863
414
18,580
Dekker_Tifosi said:
it's 5km :rolleyes: ofcourse the differences are very small. 10 seconds on 5km still means he lost 2 seconds per km :rolleyes: and almost 1 second per km on Evans
You clearly lack every form of perspective

Yawn.

It was a good time for Nibali. Ofcourse he isn't competing with the TT machines, but losing a few seconds on Evans and Wiggins is a good time for Nibali. He can take more on a downhill ;)

I'm really glad Nibali will ride the TdF. I'm convinced he will be aggresive... on the downhill mostly probably, but that's good enough.
 
May 20, 2009
8,934
7
17,495
Dekker_Tifosi said:
it's 5km :rolleyes: ofcourse the differences are very small. 10 seconds on 5km still means he lost 2 seconds per km :rolleyes: and almost 1 second per km on Evans
You clearly lack every form of perspective

But I guess distance is irrelevant to you as well. LOL
You're such a joke. You start with placing and now you say the course is too short. You clearly always look for excuses. :D

Be accountable.
 
Apr 7, 2011
4,886
439
16,580
2. Wiggins Bradley +01
101. SCHLECK Andy +29

So that's 28 seconds.
That's 4,9 seconds per km

Tour has 101km TT
That's 8 minutes 20 seconds.
Good luck taking that back in the mounatins:D:p
 
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
cineteq said:
You're such a joke. You start with placing and now you say the course is too short. You clearly always look for excuses. :D

Be accountable.

Can you read? You're making a fool out of yourself with the bolded part. I'm not saying that.

Try reading again and then come back. :eek: The joke is on you
 
Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Logic-is-your-friend said:
lol, not really. He has never sucked as much at prologues, that's true. But to say he did "much better" would insinuate he ever came close enough to winning one (and i'm talking about the last 4 to 5 years). And my remark was first and foremost based on his statement that he wouldn't be "up there" in the Dauphiné.

He was pretty decent in the short TT in Andalucia. Must have been top 5. OF course better field here.

Edit, 3rd in 2011
 
May 5, 2009
1,905
443
11,580
Wow so much effort by Wiggins to be the first loser. Well Done Luke. This prologue shows absolutely nothing when Tour favorites are considered.