Fully agree. But what should be the definition of an uphill sprint - more than 500meters at more than 5%, or longer with even more elevation?About time they just used actual times in uphill finishes because this is just BS. Almeida getting the same time as someone finishing 15 seconds behind him.
Hope Almeida will not have to drag the entire peloton today. Could be interesting to see him in a free role.About time they just used actual times in uphill finishes because this is just BS. Almeida getting the same time as someone finishing 15 seconds behind him.
Stage 1 was a sprinters' stage. There weren't any gaps in that second group. IMHO the timings were fine.
I don't think you get Logic's logical point.
I guess not. In Stage 2, the last rider in the front group got the same time as Gaviria despite finishing over 15 seconds later. What's so magical about the slight incline in Stage 1?
900 meters at 6.1% is a sprinters stage? That must be why the top 10 was littered with sprinters.Stage 1 was a sprinters' stage. There weren't any gaps in that second group. IMHO the timings were fine.
I guess not. In Stage 2, the last rider in the front group got the same time as Gaviria despite finishing over 15 seconds later. What's so magical about the slight incline in Stage 1?
Fully agree. But what should be the definition of an uphill sprint - more than 500meters at more than 5%, or longer with even more elevation?
It varies quite a bit depending on technicality, duration and incline, so it's hard to make a really rigid rule.Fully agree. But what should be the definition of an uphill sprint - more than 500meters at more than 5%, or longer with even more elevation?
Maybe they could simply apply a rule for how many watts per kilo it takes to complete a section of at least 500 meters within the final 3k (for instance) at a certain velocity. Once the watts per kilo exceed a certain threshold > boom shakalaka.It varies quite a bit depending on technicality, duration and incline, so it's hard to make a really rigid rule.
Depends. Does the estimated W/kg take into account local variations of the earth's gravitational force?Maybe they could simply apply a rule for how many watts per kilo it takes to complete a section of at least 500 meters within the final 3k (for instance) at a certain velocity. Once the watts per kilo exceed a certain threshold > boom shakalaka.
No. But feel free to add a mathematical formula for it.Depends. Does the estimated W/kg take into account local variations of the earth's gravitational force?