42nd Vuelta a Burgos (2.PRO) // July 28th - August 1st 2020

Page 11 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 19, 2009
9,892
1,790
20,680
Tomorrow's stage should be great. I'll take Chaves and Landa followed by Sosa and Carapaz.
 
Jul 28, 2020
57
39
3,730
About time they just used actual times in uphill finishes because this is just BS. Almeida getting the same time as someone finishing 15 seconds behind him.
Fully agree. But what should be the definition of an uphill sprint - more than 500meters at more than 5%, or longer with even more elevation?
 
I guess not. In Stage 2, the last rider in the front group got the same time as Gaviria despite finishing over 15 seconds later. What's so magical about the slight incline in Stage 1?

In an uphill finish, even if it's not a mountain, the person who finishes 3rd probably did just way better than the one finishing 15th, even if there was never a gap. 15th is not where he is because there was no space, he could probably easily have come along, but he was just not riding/ climbing so well.
 
Last edited:
Jul 10, 2014
14,991
25,986
28,180
EeKlLjnWsAAYbKx


EeKeAftX0AAbZz4


EeKNdcnXkAIsac4


EeKAlk-WAAEv5ra
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rollthedice
Fully agree. But what should be the definition of an uphill sprint - more than 500meters at more than 5%, or longer with even more elevation?

Anything that is given KoM points. I believe this is the determining factor in whether the 3km rule applies. It would not unduly affect the KoM competition if some stage finishes were declared cat 4 hills.

Alternatively, let the race organisers choose which stages they want to be subject to the rule, and put it in the roadbook. And hopefully the commentators will actually read it and get it right occasionally.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,883
44,268
28,180
Fully agree. But what should be the definition of an uphill sprint - more than 500meters at more than 5%, or longer with even more elevation?
It varies quite a bit depending on technicality, duration and incline, so it's hard to make a really rigid rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Feb 20, 2012
53,883
44,268
28,180
Maybe they could simply apply a rule for how many watts per kilo it takes to complete a section of at least 500 meters within the final 3k (for instance) at a certain velocity. Once the watts per kilo exceed a certain threshold > boom shakalaka.
Depends. Does the estimated W/kg take into account local variations of the earth's gravitational force?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan

Latest posts