The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
As for Pidcock's sprint, i think nobody wasted less energy in the race than him. He was in last position most of the last 50km, he's small, always out of the wind, he's light and doesn't suffer on the climbs, and he's a CX rider and has no issues with twisting, turning or cobbles. He was probably the most fresh guy there. It was a nice sprint, but let's not turn him into a sprinting beast.
As for Pidcock's sprint, i think nobody wasted less energy in the race than him. He was in last position most of the last 50km, he's small, always out of the wind, he's light and doesn't suffer on the climbs, and he's a CX rider and has no issues with twisting, turning or cobbles. He was probably the most fresh guy there. It was a nice sprint, but let's not turn him into a sprinting beast.
Can't wait to see Pidcock demolish Ewan, Bennett and Demare in the Tour next year.
I think it's inappropriate that you react like this after this post from yesterday:Nope, that's Remco's job!![]()
I'm still waiting for the "if only Remco was here........" rubbish.
As for Pidcock's sprint, i think nobody wasted less energy in the race than him. He was in last position most of the last 50km, he's small, always out of the wind, he's light and doesn't suffer on the climbs, and he's a CX rider and has no issues with twisting, turning or cobbles. He was probably the most fresh guy there. It was a nice sprint, but let's not turn him into a sprinting beast.
I like that he tries to make races. My memory is bad and getting worse so I won't remember today at the the end of his career.I wonder how many races Mathieu “could have” won at the end of his career if he had raced more “smartly”.
I think it’s clear who the strongest rider was today, and yes, he could have won. That’s something that you’ll be hearing throughout his career I suppose.
That’s the thing isn’t it. At some point it’ll all be historical data and statistics where only the win counts. At least we live in the digital age where there’s audiovisual evidence of the heroics in cycling even if not resulting into a win.I like that he tries to make races. My memory is bad and getting worse so I won't remember today at the the end of his career.![]()
Respect for Denmark. You beat my Belgian boys. We're in a small slump...compared to last year.
Oh pants, me and my big mouth, many apologies.I think it's inappropriate that you react like this after this post from yesterday:
Apologies accepted. Keep the hypocrisy to a minimum in the future.Oh pants, me and my big mouth, many apologies.
At least we had one real race this weekend.
So, when Mathieu goes off on the front, it's a real race.
But when Alaphilippe does, it's not because you don't like him?
I don't understand how this is possible. He's 1m70 and weighs 58 kg. How the hell is he able to produce those Watts?A little shocking to see that there has not been one single mention of Arjen Livyns in this thread. On the Kwaremont, he was just cruising along with Asgreen and Degenkolb who distanced all the others.
Yesterday he might not have been able to follow Alaphilippe but he certainly did seem to be able to match Ballerini, Sénéchal and co. on the cobbled climbs.
The revelation of the opening weekend.
It was about the whole race, not just the main attack. (And they were hardly equivalent).So, when Mathieu goes off on the front, it's a real race.
But when Alaphilippe does, it's not, because you don't like him?
I wouldn't exactly compare those two attacks. One was a nice try, the other was a monster ride.So, when Mathieu goes off on the front, it's a real race.
But when Alaphilippe does, it's not, because you don't like him?