The problem interpreted on the board with Efapel's tactics are twofold.
Firstly, that the positive outcome does not necessarily mean that the decision was correct, it depends on other factors.
Yeah, that's why I wrote an entire post with the reasons their tactics were objectively conductive to allow them to accomplish worthy goals instead of just ending it with the "Efapel won" quote.
A few more seconds due to not setting such a pace, or Figueiredo helping Antunes slightly more, and it's W52 who have to expend domestiques rather than Tavira when it comes to controlling the break going forward, rather than letting W52 keep their riders fresh
What? This doesn't even make logical sense. Why on earth would W52 ever chase Antunes/Figueiredo? Over a few seconds? Or whatever time?
There's no way W52 would ever do that; and if they wanted the breakway gap to close, they'd just tell Antunes to stop working and allow Gustavo César and Mas to easily eat up the gap.
The idea that they'd be chasing their own man is wildly bizarre.
As I said, the relationship between what is written here and reality is tenuous at best.
GCV is also tired faster if the gap gets bigger because Fred is working. So there were ways that the outcome could have been better.
GCV ended 7 minutes down. The only difference would be Movistar would start working earlier. I doubt the difference in gap would have been more than a few seconds either way.
Then again, let's keep in mind Figueiredo started working as soon as the team car was able to get close to him.
They have also won while doing similarly counter-intuitive things before, such as Antônio Barbio's win on Monte Assunção in 2016, when they pulled a successful 1-2 punch from the break... then took over on the front and chased their own break in which they had the sole escapee and the best climber in the chase group. Then, Barbio stayed clear so they got the stage, but they caught the chase group, and then their leaders got dropped on the climb. So they won the stage, but it was still a tactical fail.
Yeah, this never happened and, at the very least, it's a gross distortion - once again, a gross overdramatization -of what happened..
I remember that stage well enough I believe.
Minor fact, that stage was in 2017, not 2016.
Doppo, the breakaway had Barbio and another Efapel rider, Del Pino, I think but also Rui Sousa, who was within striking distance of the yellow shirt. That lead to a race situation where W52 kept a high pace on the peloton and the breakaway was never able to built a gap higher than 3 minutes or so - something close to the time Sousa was down on the GC.
It had nothing to do with Efapel chasing. It was W52 due to Rui Sousa being on the breakaway.
Eventually, an attack from Barbio stuck and he got isolated with maybe 20kms or so to go. He was alone in the long descent to Santo Tirso. I don't remember Del Pino attacking after that, and if he did it was pretty minor and immaterial. Barbio built a pretty sizeable gap to the chasers in the descent.
It was only in the fastest part of the descent, already within the last 15 kms, and with Barbio already well in front, that Efapel went to the front of the peloton and they were there for a few minutes, perhaps 3kms or so.
Barbio's victory was already pretty certain by then, but, tellingly, I'm sure the gap remained pretty much the same the entire time Efapel was "chased".
When you have a team "pulling" in front of the peloton, in very fast terrain, but the solo escapee who incidentally rides for that team somehow manages to keep the gap (and Barbio worked with Sousa and Pino throughout the stage so he was far from fresh), it's pretty easy to understand what exactly that team is doing.
Not for you or the rest of the "weird things happen in the Volta all the time, even if we have to make them up" crowd in this thread though.
It looked for a good chunk of yesterday's stage like they were planning on repeating that, since Figueiredo is their best GC option and they were reducing his gains while seeming unlikely to make realistic gains elsewhere (unless we're genuinely feeling Moreira will be a GC candidate after 11 days, which we mostly weren't at day 1).
What good chunk of yesterday's stage [Guarda's stage] are you even talking about?
They made an acceleration when approaching the final climb. That was it. There was no way whatsoever they were going to catch Figueiredo or even get much closer - the race would be accelerated by someone eventually (in fact, Feirense quickly took over).
Seriously, this is utter nonsense.
And obviously that regardless of Moreira's actual chances - no idea how they genuinely feel, personally I'd be extremely surprised if he doesn't implode in any of the remaining climbs- they're happy to sacrifice a few Antunes gains
Once again, if Figureido had given his all and they had arrived with 3 or 4 minutes, the GC would be a two men duel with Antunes possibly with a 30 seconds advantage and a long crono in hand. This woul dhave been a muich worse outcome for them.
Secondly, the history of Efapel's tactical idiocy means that even when something works, they don't get the benefit of the doubt that it was by judgement rather than luck. They have a history of chasing their own moves, of passivity when they need to attack, of prioritising the wrong rider and sacrificing riders in better form, of supporting the chase when it is counterproductive or refusing to commit when they need to help the chase, and so on. Much like Jumbo-Visma or Movistar, who have a history of tactical fails that colour people's interpretation of their attempts to enliven proceedings and mean they aren't seen as sympathetically as they might otherwise be. I mean, take all those stacked lineups from the mid-2010s where they had by far the strongest team in the race, but blew it completely by sacrificing every option for the reanimated corpse of Rui Sousa, who inevitably failed hard in the final TT against the likes of Marque and César Veloso.
I don't understand why is this a second point: it's exactly the same inane point made in the first paragraph - "they showed bad tactics before so we just make up they're showing bad tactics even when they're good".
I don't care if people do the same with other teams, it's just as idiotic. If Rabbobank or Movistar have a good show with good tactics, then they do.
Just like when Nizzolo finally won a giro stage it'd be bizarre for the thread to read "lol there goes Nizollo making another2nd spot".
Also, not really sure who they sacrificed for Rui Sousa in those years. They had some good young riders who were too young to seriously contend for the GC (Joni, Vilela, Fonte, etc) and had Broco when Marque/GCV did the 1-2 for Quinta da Lixa. The team was always strong with guys like Sousa, Nuno Ribeiro, the supercharged Sergio RIbeiro, etc, but I don't think they ever had a better GC than Rui Sousa.