- May 2, 2009
- 736
- 7
- 9,995
thewordsman...I tried to send you a PM, but they are disabled. Was going to suggest something.
PM me if you like.
PM me if you like.
thehog said:Susan will confirm that Lance emails Cyclingnews regularly to correct headlines and stories. Hence the non-printing of any factual stories from Marca.
Greg Johnson said:Good to see your posts haven't become any more factual with time.
Cheers
Greg Johnson
Greg Johnson said:Good to see your posts haven't become any more factual with time.
Cheers
Greg Johnson
auscyclefan94 said:You should read some of his comments on Australia being a barron, desert, wasteland.![]()
Love and hate is woven into the life of this 38-year-old Texan, a seven-time winner of cycling's most grueling race, the Tour de France, a man who gives of himself to cancer patients in ways others can't because he was one, a man who tried to stay retired only to get back on his bike to raise money for charity.
Last year, he overcame a broken collarbone and some snarky comments to ride in the Tour de France, stealing the spotlight from eventual winner and now ex-teammate Alberto Contador.
When Armstrong made a surprise move early in the 21-day race and got within a second of the lead, Contador was seething. "Even if he is a great champion," Contador said later, "I have never had admiration for him and I never will."But for others, Armstrong's fortunes show that good does not always triumph. Red-faced fans at the 2005 Tour de France waved placards at him, accusing him of being a doper. Though he has never tested positive, he was cursed and spit on during a dramatic time trial up the iconic L'Alpe d'Huez.
CycloErgoSum said:Who made that comment about Australia? Apart from the coastal strip around parts of the country they're pretty much right. The TDU doesn't make for a pretty backdrop to a bike race. It's dry as dawg****e. And to accuse someone of drinking Adelaide's tap water is to suggest they'll drink anything.
We discussed this at the time of Rasmussens comments.DL9999 said:What about these two then?
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/rasmussen-blames-everyone-but-himself
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/rasmussen-responds-to-stories-in-the-media
It would have been interesing to hear cyclingnews.com's position on this. Is Rasmussen not telling the truth in the second story, or is the first article simply an example of bad journalism?
It is proper to offer him the 'right to reply' or correct his original comment. It should be noted that many Danish posters confirmed that the original comment made was correct - and was not 'lost in translation'.'My words have gotten translated so many times they have lost all their meaning," Rasmussen told Cyclingnews.
theswordsman said:And it's spreading. Now on Google News from Stamford Advocate, Greenwich Time, Lexington Herald Leader, Bellingham Herald, and who knows where else it will end up?
And it's the new Google Quote
richwagmn said:LA's cooked for this season. He'll retire and go back to charity rides and the occasional competition against US domestic riders and this year's TDF.
theswordsman said:And it's spreading. Now on Google News from Stamford Advocate, Greenwich Time, Lexington Herald Leader, Bellingham Herald, and who knows where else it will end up?
And it's the new Google Quote
thehog said:Next year he'll milk the triathalon market for all its worth. There's still money in this old dog and he's going to get his hands on it.
the critique should be directed in general at the lack of investigative journalism, cn and Het Nieuwsblad included.today's cn article said:he said in an interview with the Belgian newspaper Het Nieuwsblad
Mrs John Murphy said:With the Landis allegations we need serious journalism and integrity from the media - McQuaid has already gone into the normal playbook accusing Landis of being bitter etc to avoid investigating the accusations. The UCI can not be allowed to simply try to sweep the claims under the carpet and it is up to the media to hold McQuaid to account.
