Re: Re:
NFL media, and media in general, are steering clear of it for now. But I don't think Al J. is done quite yet. More to come.
Pazuzu said:Excellent post! You're right - it doesn't add up. I just hope the media keep on this. If Manning is going claim that the HGH was for his wife, and then hides behind the 'medical privacy' card, I'm assuming the worst.arcus said:The key for me is that Manning’s agent did not deny that growth hormone was shipped to the athletes wife, stating that “Any medical treatment received by Ashley is a private matter of hers, her doctor, and her family” Accordingly it would covered by US HIPAA laws, so the clinic cannot comment to press. If the allegations were fabricated and no HGH was shipped to either of them, I'd expect his agent to have emphasized that in the strongest terms, and make it clear that anyone stating otherwise would be pursued in court. That didn't happen, leaving me with the impression that she may indeed have been shipped the drug.
As pointed out in the documentary, HGH prescribing is highly regulated, and restricted to 3 serious conditions (2 of which her body habitus suggests she does not suffer from). Then, the question becomes why on earth would someone with her resources be getting treatment for a complex, serious medical disorder in an anti-aging clinic? Does not compute.
Oh, and Manning's mock outrage over this brings to mind a certain outfield for the Milwaukee Brewers. If Manning is guilty, all I can say is Ryan "I'd bet my life" Braun is the better actor. Which is somewhat surprising given all those Peyton Manning TV ads.
NFL media, and media in general, are steering clear of it for now. But I don't think Al J. is done quite yet. More to come.