Re: Re:
This has been discussed a lot over the years, but I'd argue that Froome certainly was not near his peak shape at the 2014 Vuelta. Just look at how he fared relative to some other rivals like Aru, Rodriguez and Valverde. At times he was having difficulty against them, whereas In TDF form he would be a whole level above them. His TT in that Vuelta was also way down on what one would expect when he is close to top form. His form was very erratic throughout that Vuelta. He said in an interview before the race that he was just using it to get good racing mileage in his legs for the following season. Obviously when he found he was in contention, he tried for the win. But his form just wasn't quite good enough and Contador's form was better.
Singer01 said:Again, insane thinking. How did they compete under the same circumstances? Both coming back from an injury is not the same circumstances. I have broken my ankles many times, some times it has taken 4-5 weeks to come back, sometimes 3 months. These are similar injuries on the same person which have taken totally different amounts of times to heal.KyoGrey said:PremierAndrew said:For reference, Froome finished behind: Dan Martin, TJvG, Porte Zakarin and Bardet to mention a few at this year's Catalunya.
But unlike Catalunya, Dauphine has been a very good indicator of form going into the Tour (apart from Nibs, but let's not go into that here)
And sure, Contador was better than Froome at the Vuelta, and to suggest Froome didn't care for the Vuelta is ridiculous. He was beaten fair and square. But they both had a month to prepare for that Vuelta, unlike the Tour where they would have been preparing for several months, so to say that Contador would have beaten Froome in the 2014 Tour based off the Vuelta result is also not a valid argument
Lets be clear: the subject of the discussion is whether Contador would've hung for his dear life against Froome in 2014 Tour.
Your argument is YES based in Stage 2 of the Dauphiné where Froome and Contador arrived at s.t. and at the ITT where Froome won by 8 seconds. You also say that the other stages where Contador turned the table are not valid due to Froome's crash. Okey.
My argument is NO based in:
- In other races during that season where Contador and Froome competed under same circunstances (Cataluña, Vuelta), the Spaniard got the upper hand.
- Contador showed that that season he was also in an unprecedented good form in other races like Tirreno and Pais Vasco, while Froome had arguably one of his worst winter-springs preparations ever, full of illnesses.
But of course we will never know. Cheers.
This has been discussed a lot over the years, but I'd argue that Froome certainly was not near his peak shape at the 2014 Vuelta. Just look at how he fared relative to some other rivals like Aru, Rodriguez and Valverde. At times he was having difficulty against them, whereas In TDF form he would be a whole level above them. His TT in that Vuelta was also way down on what one would expect when he is close to top form. His form was very erratic throughout that Vuelta. He said in an interview before the race that he was just using it to get good racing mileage in his legs for the following season. Obviously when he found he was in contention, he tried for the win. But his form just wasn't quite good enough and Contador's form was better.
