Re: Re:
Why only respond to part of my post ?
again , all your saying is Froome is only on form when he wins
also why leave out the impact of his team ? chances are he doesn't beat Q at last years Tour without them as evidenced by the amount of times he was dropped only to have G drag him back
Froome is a tremendous rider but he is beatable , probably not by an aging Contador but that doesn't change the fact an in form Quintana is easily at his level and could win this years tour if he is also on form . Froome wins the 12 tour if he was allowed but last year was a different story and i do believe he wouldn't have won without his team so stop acting like he's doing it all alone .
as far as the Vuelta goes , he was on good form but his team wasn't at the same level which left him exposed and was the reason he lost
buchanan said:red zone said:buchanan said:Singer01 said:if i never get to see a top form contador going against a top form froome (for more than 1 stage - 2014 dauphine) it will be one of the greatest sporting regrets of my life.
Didn't you hear? Apparently that happened at the Vuelta 2014. Even though Froome was clearly not at his peak level at the 2014 Vuelta - and was battling in the mountains with the likes of Aru, Valverde and Purito and finished far back in the ITT. That was apparently still a top shape Froome according to some of the posters on this thread.
so any time he loses he isn't in top form ?
Considering when Froome's in top form he's easily the best these days - as evidenced in 2013 and 2015 Tour (and probably would have been in 2014 Tour if he hadn't crashed out early and broken his hand), I would have to answer Yes to that question. He has won every Tour and Dauphine that he's finished since 2013. He's very likely going to win this Dauphine and Tour too. Possibly would have beaten Wiggins at 2012 Tour as well if he had been allowed to race him.
I'm not even a Froome fan. I actually wish Contador can somehow beat him at the Tour (not gonna happen). But I came to realize he's easily the best nowadays and has been since 2012/13. He delivers the goods when it counts again and again, despite what his detractors like to dream up. To my eyes he was obviously a level or two below his peak form at the 2014 Vuelta - but he still managed to ride himself into some form and be a serious threat. He's an outstanding talent.
Why only respond to part of my post ?
again , all your saying is Froome is only on form when he wins
also why leave out the impact of his team ? chances are he doesn't beat Q at last years Tour without them as evidenced by the amount of times he was dropped only to have G drag him back
Froome is a tremendous rider but he is beatable , probably not by an aging Contador but that doesn't change the fact an in form Quintana is easily at his level and could win this years tour if he is also on form . Froome wins the 12 tour if he was allowed but last year was a different story and i do believe he wouldn't have won without his team so stop acting like he's doing it all alone .
as far as the Vuelta goes , he was on good form but his team wasn't at the same level which left him exposed and was the reason he lost
