It's fine to be Steve Bauer fan. He was a great rider and well liked in the peloton. He was one of the few, and by far the most successful Canadian rider of his time. But don't lose reason and go off the farm and start trashing people with absurd and false claims just because you're a fan of Steve Bauer.
Neworld said:
How do you know that he NEVER blood doped on a team of blood dopers, and then beat them in the very race we know they doped in?
Read up you nitwit. This is growing wearisome. From Wikipedia:
"Steve Hegg won a gold and a silver; Rebecca Twigg, Pat McDonough and Leonard Nitz won silver medals. They were identified in the subsequent inquiry as having had transfusions. The others were John Beckman, Mark Whitehead and Brent Emery. The rest of the team refused."
All of the above were TRACK riders with the exception of Twigg, who rode both pursuit and the road race. NONE of the men's road team blood doped. PERIOD.
Neworld said:
How do you value the honesty of a forthcoming doper?
Depends. In this case quite highly. And much more highly than someone who is obviously doping, has had numerous people corroborate his doping, and yet that person continues to maintain their innocence. Like Lance.
If you bother to read the interviews with Alexi, it is pretty clear that he has been quite forthcoming and is not holding anything back.
Neworld said:
Rules are in place for a reason. He had a banned product in his system, was caught and somehow managed to circumvent the punishment in time to make the Olympics? Explain why he deserved to be there after testing positive?
Simple. BECAUSE HE FOLLOWED THE RULES.
Again, go read up (something you seem to have trouble with).
He was busted and received the standard (for that time) 30 day suspension. He appealed, and the testing company admitted that they could not distinguish between ephedrine and Alexi's (legal at that time) asthma medication. The suspension was repealed. End of story.
Neworld said:
How do you know this? The preceeding evidence of his life and life-style would suggest the opposite.
Uhh... I just told you why. All of this is in the material linked in various articles in this thread. Just try reading.
Neworld said:
Probably because he's soft-spoken, has respect for the sport and doesn't see the utility in complaining about it. We should get CN to do a Steve Bauer interview and ask him what he thinks about doping, dopers and specifically AG.
Agreed with all of that, especially would enjoy reading an interview with Steve Bauer on anything he wants to talk about.
Neworld said:
Is this one of those instances where you KNOW that the Norse did drugs but also KNOW that AG never did blood doping?
I never said that I KNEW the Norwegian team was doping. I never raced against the guy that got 4th, but bronze medalist Dag-Otto Lauritzen lived in the States for a while. (I can't remember, but he may have married an American.) He would stay in Colorado for many weeks before the Coors and participate in the "local" races. Remember, the "local" Colorado races back then every week had people like Phinney, Hampsten, Kiefel, Grewal, Prehn, and others, with more joining before the Coors for altitude training, like the Stetina brothers, Thurlow, Gavin, et cetera, et cetera. In other words, these were practically like European pro events. All of these guys would turn pro immediately after the Olympics and within a couple of years were kicking **** in Europe.
Dag-Otto was a good rider, but believe me that to say he was the third best amateur in the world at that time stretches my credulity. I raced against all of these guys. I could believe Dag-Otto in the top 20. But to be on the podium is pretty, well, unbelievable.
Was he doping? I have no idea. There has been no mention of this that I know of. At that time, the only effective ways of doping were steroids (go Eddy!) and "blood-packing". Blood packing was first popularized by middle distance runner Lasse Viren of....no, not Norway, but Finland. Lasse's antics came to light in the 1980 Olympics (as I recall), so this was not a mystery. It wasn't illegal at that time in cycling, although it's use was "discouraged" (whatever the hell that means). All I'm saying is that just as some performances at the modern TdF's are "suspicious" is that 3rd and 4th at the Olympic road race for Norway (especially having raced against the bronze medalist) was definitely "suspicious" to me.
Do you think that Eddie B. was the only guy to think about blood-packing? I'm just askin', that's all.