D-Queued said:The UCI is thoroughly corrupt. Always has been. That is why WADA was formed. No other sport governing body can claim anything like that example of self-indictment.
We focus a lot on the Lance relationship, but one of the best examples of corruption comes from Festina.
The Tour organizers banned riders Richard Virenque and Pascal Hervé from Festina, ONCE's Manolo Saiz and Dr. Nicolas Terrados, and the entire TVM-Farm Frites team.
But, the UCI stepped in, overruled the Tour organizers and forced them to accept Virenque's participation in the 1999 Tour. Virenque, of course, later admitted to doping in 1998.
From Wikipedia:
Race director Jean-Marie Leblanc banned Virenque from the 1999 Tour de France but was obliged to accept him after a ruling by the Union Cycliste Internationale.[19] Lichfield wrote in The Independent:
"The sport of road-race cycling (and it may not be the only one) is like an alcoholic, refusing to accept that it has a problem, as long as it drinks in secrecy. That fact was shamefully proved once again this week when the sport's governing body - the International Cycling Union (UCI) - forced the 1999 Tour to accept Richard Virenque... The baby-faced Virenque faces possible criminal charges of drug-taking and drug-trafficking. Despite his denials, French judicial investigators say they have documentary evidence that he has been doping himself for years. The Tour said last month that he was 'not welcome.' The UCI insisted on Tuesday that he must ride. The Tour gave way. So much for ethical purity."[15]
Cycling Weekly in Britain called it "a major blow" to the Tour's organisers.[22] Leblanc said he hoped Virenque would not win.
Dave.
good spot.
i don't remember this being brought up previously in the clinic in relation to UCI's corrupthood.
broadens the perspective.