mewmewmew13 said:
exactly what blackcat says ziggie
this was POST treatment and he was trying to find a little support and help..which is what I thought LS should be there for…
y'know to help him find some agencies or places that might help someone w cancer issues and needs...
You’re viewing this too simply.
Some context if I may;
There are two distinct issues here.
The first being healthcare in the US. Mr. Smith never should have found himself in the position that he was in. If he lived in the UK, Western Europe, Australia, Canada, most of the middle east etc. he wouldn’t have faced the prospect that he did with no cover. Most of the modernized world provides free health cover to its citizens. South America provides this service albeit with poorer infrastructure.
Now there is a political and philosophical view in the US that “our” taxes shouldn’t have to pay for the health cover of those less fortunate or whom have no cover. Probably not a debate for this thread. However a good portion of the civilized world has centralized and free health cover for its citizens.
Anywhere else in the world Mr. Smith would have been seen by a doctor for his monthly blood numbers and remission tests (as an aside the Affordable care Act is trying to change some of this).
The second point is, yes, Livestrong. Because of this unique situation in the US whereby medical cover is not a right, people are left hanging not knowing which way to go. Livestrong’s game was (or is) survivorship. They would assist and help you navigate your way around the process of hospitals, treatments, insurance companies etc. They were never a entity to provide health cover or fund treatment etc. as in Smith’s case.
Trust me when diagnosed, the Doctor who tells you will give you around 10-15 minutes per day as he has 40+ patients to get through on a typical oncology ward. A good resource is very helpful. Livestrong is that resource as there are so many more out there who are much better and don’t require donations as precursor to assisting you.
When diagnosed you have to make some very quick and life determining decisions. Do we try to conceive children now?, to operate or not operate, chemo, radiation etc. Not only are you adjusting to the fact your life will change forever but you have to make decisions about your life and you don’t know what impact those decisions will have. Several groups step in here and offer advice and most if not all are charities.
In the example Smith gave to “raise $4000” their working model was that Livestrong would provide volunteers, Livestrong merchandise and you would hold an event for your loved one and raise money. If for example you raised $6000, Livestrong would get $4000 and you would keep the $2000 for yourself to pay for treatment etc. As an aside this work was sourced out to local providers and was not done by LS. I assume the premise here is you’d bank on the golden name of Livestrong & Lance for your event so you could raise more money for your loved one and for Livestrong (Lance). I also know that certain dollar amounts raised received personal “kickers” – i.e. if you raised 10k is was a riding with Lance on the front row of Ride for the Roses, 20k got a personal ride etc. that sort of thing.
Now this is not too different than what charities do for entries into the marathons etc. If you want to run London or New York and don’t want to risk a ballot you can buy a place via a charity. Your only requirement was to raise x amount for y charity.
I had experience with the MacMillian foundation in the UK who would send out nurses to people’s home for comfort etc. All that came mostly from donations. That type of work had real and dramatic effects to a person whom has cancer and their family. Compare that to Livestrong and they are streets ahead.
My abject criticism of Livestrong has always been the way it promoted itself and its attempt to profit from the commercial arm. The fact they spent so much on promotion, nice office space etc. and so little on actual ground level work was deplorable. Most of what they did was an excuse for junkets, rides with Lance and corporate hospitality events. I very much doubt they will survive beyond the next year or two.
However the crux of the issue comes down to healthcare and the lack of healthcare in the US for those without insurance and coverage. That really was the issue with Smith. If he lived in Canada he wouldn’t need Lance, Livestrong or an insurance provider.
Yes Armstrong deserves all he gets here but a good look at our government is a better place to start. I happily let my taxes pay for the health care of others. Always have. Many do not. It's really a question if we as taxes payers accept the will to support others.