BotanyBay said:
I'm glad he spilled his beans. I just don't think he's done it with proper humility.
In an imperfect world with complicated and conflicting values and morals, some altruistic and others self-serving and vindictive existing within all of us simultaneously, situations like this cannot be served to us on the pious platter we'd prefer.
We just have to deal with it.
If Landis acted out of a thirst for revenge, then good for him. How many times has Armstrong done exactly the same thing?
What Armstrong is learning is the age-old lesson-to get back at a remorseless bully, you have to speak to them in the only language they understand, which is to punch them right in the face.
Armstrong is no longer protected by the cloak of omerta, which turned most well-meaning lesser players in Armstrong's reign of terror into blithering cowards. They saw those who spoke out marginalized and thought only of their careers and families. That is a tough choice for any man to have to consider.
I'm sure it must have been quite emasculating to have one's testicles cut off in public like Simeoni and a few others. He was one of the riders who suffered the most, publicly humiliated by the peloton and barred from riding his own national Tour by this yellow-clad ape.
So whatever Landis' reasons were for exposing Armstrong and Bruyneel, that's neither here nor there. It's not a viable argument for obstructing justice or sweeping this under the rug.
The conjecture will end as far as Armstrong's drug use the second we hear that another rider confirmed the organized team doping.
The ball is no longer in Armstrong's court. Now we all must wait and see what the next move will be.