SundayRider said:This. Wiggins was virtually unbeatable in 2012, the Tour win was NID. Just so happens that 2012 was also the biggest year for sport (and cycling) in pretty much forever in the UK. Just a conincidence that.
thehog said:Yes and by sheer coincidence it was an Olympic year and the Olympics were in Britian. What are the chances of that?!!![]()
Digger said:Can anyone think of a rider who dominated in one calendar year, for eight months, like Wiggins did in 2012? And to a slightly lesser extent Froome in 2013...how amazing was it that they kept entering races with weak fields...
Simple fact is that if they are both clean, then they are both the greatest cyclists of all time...something they certainly didn't show previously.
SundayRider said:And yet neither could repear the feat the year later or showed indications of such outright dominance in the years previously.
yespatterns said:I'm pretty sure I'm happier not knowing.
Netserk said:It's called satire and in the case of blackcat it's freaking hilarious.
The Hitch said:The only person doing any spinning is you. To equate a guy who rode peyresoudes as fast as contador and beat Vincenzo Nibali in the mountains on top of.putting out two of the fastest and most dominant tts (in the middle and end of a gt) to west ham is obvious trolling.
And it's clearly proven wrong by the power output comparisons between years which show that Wiggins 2012 performance was good enough to challenge in any year. And that itself is only for those so ignorant of cycling history they don't realize that Wiggins came 4th in the superfast 2009 tour de France.
As for contador and schleck being out someone actually thinking for themselves would realize that Contador hasn't done anything at the Tour de France for 4 years and Andy Schleck has failed to even finish the race in 3.
B-b-b-but wiggo s had a historically favourable circumstances right? Because two riders who don't challenge at the tour anymore, didn't challenge him at the tour.
Contador wasn't at the 2008 race. And the 2nd best gt rider wasn't there. And the third best gt rider wasn't there. And the 4th best gt rider wasn't there. Landis also missed the 2007 version. Ulrich and Basso also missed the 2007 and 2006 versions.
Imagine that? Races where the top 3,4,5 best gt riders in the world aren't even turning up to the start line? Happens all the time. By your weird reasoning Landis winning 2006 was like Sunderland winning the premier league because the top 5 teams were dqd, contador (like the 10th favourite before the year) would be like Everton winning and Sastre 08 was like a division 2 team becoming premier league champions because everyone above them was dqd.
But in reality we know that all these tdf winners ultimately put out insane performances. And we know that with Wiggins because he wiped the floor with the second most accomplished gt rider of the last decade.
But Wiggins had historic circumstances and was like west ham
Not that Andy schleck was even a major favourite for the race or anything.
hogthehog said:I'm just trying to work out what 'musclar christianity' is !?!?!!![]()
Muscular Christianity is a Christian commitment to piety and physical health, basing itself on the New Testament, which sanctions the concepts of character (Philippians 3:14) and well-being (1Corinthians 6:19–20).[1][2][3]
The movement came into vogue during the Victorian era and stressed the need for energetic Christian evangelism in combination with an ideal of vigorous masculinity.
You still have to go a long way to make amends for Kylie & Jason, Men at Work etc. The only Aussie acts worth anything other than Midnight Oil are dead.blackcat said:u got Morrissey and Bowie, we got Dan Sultan.
we win
Dan Sultan good Aussie c0ck rock we win this 2
sorry to say, empire crew lose this one too.
blackcat said:u got Morrissey and Bowie, we got Dan Sultan.
we win
Dan Sultan good Aussie c0ck rock we win this 2
sorry to say, empire crew lose this one too.
ultimobici said:You still have to go a long way to make amends for Men at Work etc.
Granville57 said:Indeed. Hard to fathom that the same island responsible for Men at Work also produced Mark "Chopper" Read. Given its history, however, the former is much more the surprise than the latter.
Britain's Team Sky, who have produced two of the three most recent Tour de France victors in Chris Froome and Sir Bradley Wiggins, have been praised for their policy of zero tolerance. Nobody employed by the team can have any connection to doping, past or present. Their model has been the subject of discussion with other teams who have approached team principal Sir Dave Brailsford, enquiring as to the practical application of the policy. This is one of the reasons why Brailsford believes the peleton is largely clean.
"I generally do think so. I think that if people have been trying to cheat, and, they are getting caught, that is important," he says. "People don't want to cheat, ultimately. I think there is a general movement in the peleton to where people want to be able to race clean. Also, I think the EPO generation is slowly retiring and moving on from the sport and we have a new generation coming through, and that new generation was never involved in the systematic doping of teams."
Granville57 said:
bobbins said:Praised? Mocked more like.
Any article where basic spelling is overlooked isn't worth reading.
Granville57 said:
Bernie's eyesore said:Fair play to Brailsford. By showing you can win clean he's convinced all the other teams to be clean as well. He's single handedly cleaned up the sport. After all, why would anybody bother doping when Sky have shown you can race faster drug free?