Cancellara

Page 17 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
He definitely had a magical transformation in late 2009. And he won his first Monument and time trial WC the moment he started working with Luigi Cecchini and Riis.
 
Does that explain his career climbing peak being in June 2009? Methinks he had targeted the Mendrisio Worlds from afar. Might explain why his Classics campaign that year was so bad, come to think about it.

And the word 'literally' has no place in metaphors. Literally and Metaphorically are, or at least should be, complete antonyms.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Libertine Seguros said:
Does that explain his career climbing peak being in June 2009? Methinks he had targeted the Mendrisio Worlds from afar. Might explain why his Classics campaign that year was so bad, come to think about it.

And the word 'literally' has no place in metaphors. Literally and Metaphorically are, or at least should be, complete antonyms.

His chain snapped at the Koppenberg in 2009 and he was sick that year.

Cancellara was already climbing at a level he shouldn't in 2008.

Me thinks Cancellara doped much more than other riders for the WC in his home country.
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
El Pistolero said:
Me thinks Cancellara doped much more than other riders for the WC in his home country.
That must be the reason why he put Wigan on five and Froome on four and a half minutes.

And he won his first Monument and time trial WC the moment he started working with Luigi Cecchini and Riis.
So, he was not training at Cecchini when he was riding for Ferretti? Or Santucione?
 
Cancellator said:
However, there are some things that really go in his favour. Namely, he always had great talent, winning the Junior world TT champs twice for example (1998, 1999, a long time ago). Also, I don't think doping gives you as big an advantage in classics as it does in GTs (even Tyler said so in his book I think). Last but not least, he never had any miraculous transformations, such as suddenly becoming a great climber while improving his TT... Actually we can see how his TT has worsened in the last few years (or perhaps he's not trying as hard).
Also, he was a zero on UCI's suspicion index.

That doesn't mean he is clean of course, but it shows that his blood values must have been very stable. Which implicates that he can't have been doping that much, unless he has an insanely good program (better than e.g. Armstrong and Wiggins).
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
maltiv said:
Also, he was a zero on UCI's suspicion index.

That doesn't mean he is clean of course, but it shows that his blood values must have been very stable. Which implicates that he can't have been doping that much, unless he has an insanely good program (better than e.g. Armstrong and Wiggins).

Only it wasn't a suspicion index, that's what L'equipe made from it.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
maltiv said:
Also, he was a zero on UCI's suspicion index.

That doesn't mean he is clean of course, but it shows that his blood values must have been very stable. Which implicates that he can't have been doping that much, unless he has an insanely good program (better than e.g. Armstrong and Wiggins).

How many Swiss riders had a high suspicion index score over 3?

I doubt UCI, based in Aigle, Switzerland will go after Swiss riders willingly.
 

ANCrider

BANNED
Mar 25, 2013
81
0
0
Benotti69 said:
How many Swiss riders had a high suspicion index score over 3?

I doubt UCI, based in Aigle, Switzerland will go after Swiss riders willingly.

Of course the fact that there are only 2 Swiss riders of any significance in the World Tour rankings wouldn't have anything to do with it, would it?

Oh no. :rolleyes:

(there are also Zaugg, Tschopp and Frank, but you probably have never heard of them)
 
Dec 27, 2010
6,674
1
0
Cancellator said:
However, there are some things that really go in his favour. Namely, he always had great talent, winning the Junior world TT champs twice for example (1998, 1999, a long time ago). Also, I don't think doping gives you as big an advantage in classics as it does in GTs (even Tyler said so in his book I think). Last but not least, he never had any miraculous transformations, such as suddenly becoming a great climber while improving his TT... Actually we can see how his TT has worsened in the last few years (or perhaps he's not trying as hard).

Did he?

He went to the bother of getting a BB before Liege 2003 and it seemed to work pretty well from where I was sitting.
 
will10 said:
Did he?

He went to the bother of getting a BB before Liege 2003 and it seemed to work pretty well from where I was sitting.
Of course it works, but a key benefit of doping that doesn't play such a big role in the classics is recovery. You still get better recovery from training, of course, but daily recovery during a race is a huge factor too.
 
hrotha said:
Of course it works, but a key benefit of doping that doesn't play such a big role in the classics is recovery. You still get better recovery from training, of course, but daily recovery during a race is a huge factor too.
On the other hand doping also helps a lot with endurance, which is more important in classics. No way there would be any 'big' bunch sprints in MSR without the dope.
 
Jul 17, 2012
5,303
0
0
I think it's reactionary and misleading to play down the benefits on PEDs in a one-day race. Strength, stamina, size, power can all be tweaked.

3 week long stage races are a fairly unique mainstream sporting event, few make such demands of endurance, but one day races are much more inline with the demands of other sport. Presumably re-infusing the day before the race after racing and training in preperation is going to give you a big boost.
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,112
0
0
They even started x-raying bikes because Luigi's 2010 attacks were so utterly and incomprehensibly ridiculous.
 
Jan 30, 2011
802
0
0
happychappy said:
They even started x-raying bikes because Luigi's 2010 attacks were so utterly and incomprehensibly ridiculous.

I would say it was more Cecchini's allegations that were incomprehensibly ridiculous.
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,112
0
0
peterst6906 said:
I would say it was more Cecchini's allegations that were incomprehensibly ridiculous.

Sure sure :D

Hematide said:
A never before seen picture of clasicomano luigi caught off guard! :D
BChf_lpCAAENWjQ.png
 
del1962 said:
So you are saying Tyler was wrong, not a Fuentes client?

No, Im saying he is still doping ( after Tyler revealed he was probably Luigi i was vocal about my opinion that Cancellara may struggle because he has to stop doping, kind of how GIlbert did after he stopped working with Iburaugen Taus)
 
Jul 25, 2011
157
0
0
happychappy said:
They even started x-raying bikes because Luigi's 2010 attacks were so utterly and incomprehensibly ridiculous.

I hope they still are!
Sprinting without coming out of the saddle
Out climbing everyone @1400w while sitting

just saying (slightly sarcastic :rolleyes:)
 
Mar 4, 2012
701
0
0
wannab said:
I hope they still are!
Sprinting without coming out of the saddle
Out climbing everyone @1400w while sitting

just saying (slightly sarcastic :rolleyes:)

I know you're not 100% serious, but just for the record...

Generally the bigger/heavier you are, the less time you should spend out of the saddle climbing. And probably even less on the pave, where you already have to waste extra energy (and where the favoured position seems to be hands on the tops, which isn't really compatible with standing).