Palmarès? I'm not sure what you mean?
You don't have to be an ex-pro to be a sports commentator. In fact, most of the most successful tandems in sports commentary are made with the combination of a play-by-play man (usually a career commentator) whose job it is to tell you what's going on, and an analyst (usually somebody from the sport) whose job it is to tell you WHY. The only sports that don't need the play-by-play man are slow-moving sports, where the statistic and discussion has plenty of time to develop by itself. Where cycling has the problem is that it has long phases like this, where the gaps in the in-depth knowledge of the play-by-play man can be found out, but often the busy end of the stage is where a play-by-play man is essential, and you'll often notice the analyst says very little, save for identifying the riders when the play-by-play man fails, at this point in the stage.
Harmon and Kirby don't need to submit their palmarès because it's not relevant to what they're being asked to do. And since the analyst role is played by Séan Kelly, I'd like to think that nobody who frequents a cycling forum would question his palmarès.
Kirby is shunted from sport to sport not because he's being kicked off the other sports but because Eurosport is a relatively low-budget operation and he's a cheap utility man who can cover, and is willing to cover, a broad base of sports. Don't Eurosport mostly use him when Harmon is covering another race at the same time? Having to put up with Kirby is actually a sign that Eurosport are committing to cycling because they're putting on two races at the same time, and they're committing to broadcasting and promoting the sport even though perhaps their budget doesn't stretch to having two fully dedicated high-level commentary teams (I'm sure retaining the services of Mr. Kelly eats up a fair bit of that budget too).
You don't have to be an ex-pro to be a sports commentator. In fact, most of the most successful tandems in sports commentary are made with the combination of a play-by-play man (usually a career commentator) whose job it is to tell you what's going on, and an analyst (usually somebody from the sport) whose job it is to tell you WHY. The only sports that don't need the play-by-play man are slow-moving sports, where the statistic and discussion has plenty of time to develop by itself. Where cycling has the problem is that it has long phases like this, where the gaps in the in-depth knowledge of the play-by-play man can be found out, but often the busy end of the stage is where a play-by-play man is essential, and you'll often notice the analyst says very little, save for identifying the riders when the play-by-play man fails, at this point in the stage.
Harmon and Kirby don't need to submit their palmarès because it's not relevant to what they're being asked to do. And since the analyst role is played by Séan Kelly, I'd like to think that nobody who frequents a cycling forum would question his palmarès.
Kirby is shunted from sport to sport not because he's being kicked off the other sports but because Eurosport is a relatively low-budget operation and he's a cheap utility man who can cover, and is willing to cover, a broad base of sports. Don't Eurosport mostly use him when Harmon is covering another race at the same time? Having to put up with Kirby is actually a sign that Eurosport are committing to cycling because they're putting on two races at the same time, and they're committing to broadcasting and promoting the sport even though perhaps their budget doesn't stretch to having two fully dedicated high-level commentary teams (I'm sure retaining the services of Mr. Kelly eats up a fair bit of that budget too).