I don't support Froome (If only he could stop to watch his handlebar every 2 seconds), but he deserves this Tour.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
TMP402 said:Blanco said:Taxus4a said:What a great rider. It is a pity he is in SKY, but he is going to wina very difficult Tour for him, with rain some days, very little ITT and with the first mountain stage erarly in the race, so without the possibility to destroy the climbers in the first mountain finish.
It seems clear that just a route like this with rain and a Quintana at his best shape can beat him. All things united.
Cycling is not just Tours, but he is a huge rider, no so loved just becouse he is in a team with big budget, but nobody give him away anything since he decided late in his life become cyclist there in South Africa. He started TdF in 2008 when it wanst planned and he showed an amazing huge potential that confirmed 3 years later to become the best Tour rider since lot of time.
I have read he is not at his best..I dont think so.. The best Aru possible has been far from him,
Yeah he stormed the cycling world in that 2008 :lol:
Taxus noticed him in 2008.
Alpe d'Huez said:I would love to see him go for a Tour/Vuelta double.
For me, this Tour was rather disappointing in many ways, including watching Froome. It seemed to me like he spent 99% of the Tour following wheels, almost always his own teammates, but others as well when no teammates were around. Granted, this isn't 1972 with Eddy Marckx riding at the front, or just attacking on every other stage. But I would have liked to have seen a little more championship grit, coming from a guy who's about to win his 4th Tour, and may have won 5 straight had he not crashed out a couple years ago (maybe 6 if allowed to press Wiggans).
burning said:TMP402 said:Blanco said:Taxus4a said:What a great rider. It is a pity he is in SKY, but he is going to wina very difficult Tour for him, with rain some days, very little ITT and with the first mountain stage erarly in the race, so without the possibility to destroy the climbers in the first mountain finish.
It seems clear that just a route like this with rain and a Quintana at his best shape can beat him. All things united.
Cycling is not just Tours, but he is a huge rider, no so loved just becouse he is in a team with big budget, but nobody give him away anything since he decided late in his life become cyclist there in South Africa. He started TdF in 2008 when it wanst planned and he showed an amazing huge potential that confirmed 3 years later to become the best Tour rider since lot of time.
I have read he is not at his best..I dont think so.. The best Aru possible has been far from him,
Yeah he stormed the cycling world in that 2008 :lol:
Taxus noticed him in 2008.
I have yet to see him posting about Froome before 2011 Vuelta
agreeSinger01 said:i imagine this experiment will be put to bed now if he wins this year, once he has the tour/vuelta double in his pocket there is no way he risks coming in this undercooked again, if LRP was here i'd give him a 25% chance of success.
Singer01 said:i imagine this experiment will be put to bed now if he wins this year, once he has the tour/vuelta double in his pocket there is no way he risks coming in this undercooked again, if LRP was here i'd give him a 25% chance of success.
saneguy said:Froome clearly isnt at his best this Tour. But he is still way above the rest of the GC contenders. He does deserve the tour although I do feel that Landa has been the strongest rider this Tour.
Merckx index said:Froome won this Tour on the short opening ITT:
After stage 1:
Froome
Bardet :39
Uran :51
After stage 18:
Froome
Bardet :23
Uran :29
Taxus4a said:What a great rider. It is a pity he is in SKY, but he is going to wina very difficult Tour for him, with rain some days, very little ITT and with the first mountain stage erarly in the race, so without the possibility to destroy the climbers in the first mountain finish.
It seems clear that just a route like this with rain and a Quintana at his best shape can beat him. All things united.
Cycling is not just Tours, but he is a huge rider, no so loved just becouse he is in a team with big budget, but nobody give him away anything since he decided late in his life become cyclist there in South Africa. He started TdF in 2008 when it wanst planned and he showed an amazing huge potential that confirmed 3 years later to become the best Tour rider since lot of time.
I have read he is not at his best..I dont think so.. The best Aru possible has been far from him,
Alpe d'Huez said:I would love to see him go for a Tour/Vuelta double.
For me, this Tour was rather disappointing in many ways, including watching Froome. It seemed to me like he spent 99% of the Tour following wheels, almost always his own teammates, but others as well when no teammates were around. Granted, this isn't 1972 with Eddy Marckx riding at the front, or just attacking on every other stage. But I would have liked to have seen a little more championship grit, coming from a guy who's about to win his 4th Tour, and may have won 5 straight had he not crashed out a couple years ago (maybe 6 if allowed to press Wiggans).
Galic Ho said:Merckx index said:Froome won this Tour on the short opening ITT:
After stage 1:
Froome
Bardet :39
Uran :51
After stage 18:
Froome
Bardet :23
Uran :29
Plus...
Stage 1 Valverde DNF.
Stage 9 Porte DNF.
Only 2 riders all season who have shown GC potential that could have rattled Froome other than Landa and Dumoulin.
I'll say it, Big Tom would win this Tour if he raced it in his Giro form.
Quintana would have won this Tour as well, had he turned up in his Giro form. Only just, but he'd have won it. He'd only need a Blockhaus stage to win this.
Froome, and Sky, got very lucky this time around. Sure, it's not over yet. But barring a misfortune, which I don't want, Sky and Froome executed a well thought out plan. He was on the ropes several times. A Valverde or Porte level shown earlier in the season would have knocked him out.
No way could Froome have prevented a strong Valverde gaining all those bonus seconds on the short sharp finishes. He'd have won all of them. Easily.
But the race is who turns up on the day. On that note, Kwiatkowski and Landa earned their keep big time...Sky were very solid and secure. Well done to them.
TMP402 said:burning said:TMP402 said:Blanco said:Taxus4a said:What a great rider. It is a pity he is in SKY, but he is going to wina very difficult Tour for him, with rain some days, very little ITT and with the first mountain stage erarly in the race, so without the possibility to destroy the climbers in the first mountain finish.
It seems clear that just a route like this with rain and a Quintana at his best shape can beat him. All things united.
Cycling is not just Tours, but he is a huge rider, no so loved just becouse he is in a team with big budget, but nobody give him away anything since he decided late in his life become cyclist there in South Africa. He started TdF in 2008 when it wanst planned and he showed an amazing huge potential that confirmed 3 years later to become the best Tour rider since lot of time.
I have read he is not at his best..I dont think so.. The best Aru possible has been far from him,
Yeah he stormed the cycling world in that 2008 :lol:
Taxus noticed him in 2008.
I have yet to see him posting about Froome before 2011 Vuelta
I believe this is Taxus on Froome, he says he noticed him earlier than 2011. Make your own mind up.
http://patrimoniociclista.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/an-unpolished-diamond-story-of-chris.html
Galic Ho said:Taxus4a said:What a great rider. It is a pity he is in SKY, but he is going to wina very difficult Tour for him, with rain some days, very little ITT and with the first mountain stage erarly in the race, so without the possibility to destroy the climbers in the first mountain finish.
It seems clear that just a route like this with rain and a Quintana at his best shape can beat him. All things united.
Cycling is not just Tours, but he is a huge rider, no so loved just becouse he is in a team with big budget, but nobody give him away anything since he decided late in his life become cyclist there in South Africa. He started TdF in 2008 when it wanst planned and he showed an amazing huge potential that confirmed 3 years later to become the best Tour rider since lot of time.
I have read he is not at his best..I dont think so.. The best Aru possible has been far from him,
I remember Barloworld.
Hunter won a stage. Then he crashed. The team was down to 4 riders!
I remember clearly John Lee Augustyn reaching the summit of the highest peak that year and then crashing down the side...he had really big feet.
Also years later, I recognised in a DVD and the interviews, that Geraint Thomas was on that squad. He'd been there.
Did not remember Chris Froome at all. Why?
Because he did absolutely nothing. Phil and Paul if they mentioned his name, it was a passing glance. Yes Froome was there, but he was of no strength or consideration in that Tour.
Amazing how people can grow huh!
Anyway, we can always continue this talk properly, in the Clinic if you'd prefer?
Galic Ho said:Merckx index said:Froome won this Tour on the short opening ITT:
After stage 1:
Froome
Bardet :39
Uran :51
After stage 18:
Froome
Bardet :23
Uran :29
Plus...
Stage 1 Valverde DNF.
Stage 9 Porte DNF.
Only 2 riders all season who have shown GC potential that could have rattled Froome other than Landa and Dumoulin.
I'll say it, Big Tom would win this Tour if he raced it in his Giro form.
Quintana would have won this Tour as well, had he turned up in his Giro form. Only just, but he'd have won it. He'd only need a Blockhaus stage to win this.
Froome, and Sky, got very lucky this time around. Sure, it's not over yet. But barring a misfortune, which I don't want, Sky and Froome executed a well thought out plan. He was on the ropes several times. A Valverde or Porte level shown earlier in the season would have knocked him out.
No way could Froome have prevented a strong Valverde gaining all those bonus seconds on the short sharp finishes. He'd have won all of them. Easily.
But the race is who turns up on the day. On that note, Kwiatkowski and Landa earned their keep big time...Sky were very solid and secure. Well done to them.
movingtarget said:The first I really remember of Froome was his battle with Cobo in the 2011 Vuelta which was the first of quite a few entertaining Vuelta races. Froome really showed his fighting qualities in that race.
TMP402 said:burning said:TMP402 said:Blanco said:Taxus4a said:What a great rider. It is a pity he is in SKY, but he is going to wina very difficult Tour for him, with rain some days, very little ITT and with the first mountain stage erarly in the race, so without the possibility to destroy the climbers in the first mountain finish.
It seems clear that just a route like this with rain and a Quintana at his best shape can beat him. All things united.
Cycling is not just Tours, but he is a huge rider, no so loved just becouse he is in a team with big budget, but nobody give him away anything since he decided late in his life become cyclist there in South Africa. He started TdF in 2008 when it wanst planned and he showed an amazing huge potential that confirmed 3 years later to become the best Tour rider since lot of time.
I have read he is not at his best..I dont think so.. The best Aru possible has been far from him,
Yeah he stormed the cycling world in that 2008 :lol:
Taxus noticed him in 2008.
I have yet to see him posting about Froome before 2011 Vuelta
I believe this is Taxus on Froome, he says he noticed him earlier than 2011. Make your own mind up.
http://patrimoniociclista.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/an-unpolished-diamond-story-of-chris.html
Sky's performance since Thomas' crash makes me think that 8 rider teams are a disadvantage for all rival teams, rather than Sky.Poursuivant said:Next years TDF will be interesting. Apparently Landa and Nieve are going, and of course there will be eight man teams. As well as that, there will be a 35km TTT, so Sky would want to bring some power for that possibly. If so, even though we don't know the profile, it makes it more difficult for Sky to control the race. It's never nice to see anyone crash out, but you also have to consider that possibility, which could leave a team down to 6 or 7 early on.
This. But I wouldn't be surprised if they send Puccio as well in place of Elissonde perhaps.IndianCyclist said:i think
Froome
Wouter
Deignan
Lopez
Rosa
Stannard
Moscon
Boswell
Elisonde