Teams & Riders Chris Froome Discussion Thread.

Page 595 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jan 18, 2020
23
4
85
Don't think INEOS would drop Froome for the tour, I honestly believe it will end up with the 3 leaders all racing against each other and they will still have by far the best chance to win in my eyes
 
Jun 15, 2020
55
24
230
No way you alienate a 23 year old defending Tour champ. He's the future. You don't want to do anything to jeopardize that relationship. Now, if Froome clearly shows he's stronger than Bernal in the mountains, that's another story.
If ineos before the tour sees that froome is in his top shape and recovered, they should go with froome as a leader and bernal a superdomestique, he is a seven grand tour champion, and at his best,bernal or anybody as no chance against froome.
 
It's a dilemma, Froome, Thomas and Bernal are all champions. And for various reaons of these three, Froome is probably the one Ineos is least connected with. But he's still the most accomplished rider in the team (and the peloton, other than arguably Nibali). I agree with Rui Machado, Froome should be #1. Ineos owes him that.
 
It's a dilemma, Froome, Thomas and Bernal are all champions. And for various reaons of these three, Froome is probably the one Ineos is least connected with. But he's still the most accomplished rider in the team (and the peloton, other than arguably Nibali). I agree with Rui Machado, Froome should be #1. Ineos owes him that.

This isn't Unzue and Movistar, this is Brailsford and Ineos. They will go with whom they think gives them the best chance to win and will and have done that in the past. In pro sports, it's mostly what have you done for me/us lately. It's rare that a team/owner/coach ever thinks they owe an athlete much of anything.
 
Reactions: SHAD0W93
It's a dilemma, Froome, Thomas and Bernal are all champions. And for various reaons of these three, Froome is probably the one Ineos is least connected with. But he's still the most accomplished rider in the team (and the peloton, other than arguably Nibali). I agree with Rui Machado, Froome should be #1. Ineos owes him that.
I think Froome owes Ineos more than Ineos owes Froome.
 
I don't think they owe Froome anything either. This is the same team that pushed Wiggins out and didn't want to support Cavendish because it had no factor on overall win besides maybe tiring riders out. Froome had a big injury, older, and hasn't raced in a longer time compared to others. The races being pushed back could even the lack of racing if his rivals haven't trained as hard. Further you have a young rider that won the Tour and should be getting better plus a darkhorse that won it before. I think they should bring him because he has value but they don't owe him. Plus think how that'll look to their young talent.
 
I don't think they owe Froome anything either. This is the same team that pushed Wiggins out and didn't want to support Cavendish because it had no factor on overall win besides maybe tiring riders out. Froome had a big injury, older, and hasn't raced in a longer time compared to others. The races being pushed back could even the lack of racing if his rivals haven't trained as hard. Further you have a young rider that won the Tour and should be getting better plus a darkhorse that won it before. I think they should bring him because he has value but they don't owe him. Plus think how that'll look to their young talent.
Or he could have over trained as well, while other riders were treating the early part of the lock down as off season and only maintain a base level.
 
Reactions: SHAD0W93
I'm looking forward to the moment in the first big mountain stage when Sivakov or whoever the last domestique is peels off, and Bernal Thomas and Froome all look at each other and say - who pulls now?
Honestly I wouldn't be suprised if Froome attacks or is the first to attack out of his team. They could ride like Astana in 09 but then who will be Contador, Armstrong, and Kloden? Results wise I think it will be Bernal, Thomas, and Froome in GC placement barring injury. Side bet, Ineos ot TLJ who's 3 leaders will finish better places on GC.
 
I don't think they owe Froome anything either. This is the same team that pushed Wiggins out and didn't want to support Cavendish because it had no factor on overall win besides maybe tiring riders out. Froome had a big injury, older, and hasn't raced in a longer time compared to others. The races being pushed back could even the lack of racing if his rivals haven't trained as hard. Further you have a young rider that won the Tour and should be getting better plus a darkhorse that won it before. I think they should bring him because he has value but they don't owe him. Plus think how that'll look to their young talent.
They probably dont. Still I'm very surprised to see it happen if it does. I had thought no matter how good or bad Froome would be right now, his best shot or in case if that's no shot, his best contract would be with Ineos.
 
Even if they don't have him as leader, Froome brings something that the likes of Sivakov or Amador don't and that's fear. The other riders fear Froome while he is still in contention. If Froome moves, they move and that is something Ineos can use. If Sivakov moves the other riders shrug their shoulders (for now, maybe they shouldn't)
 
It's a dilemma, Froome, Thomas and Bernal are all champions. And for various reaons of these three, Froome is probably the one Ineos is least connected with. But he's still the most accomplished rider in the team (and the peloton, other than arguably Nibali). I agree with Rui Machado, Froome should be #1. Ineos owes him that.
They owed him and paid him handsomely.

I pretty much agree with what others have said but I want to emphasize the Bermal factor. If they screw this up enough, this could be the last year he races for them, contract or no. Anyway, I think they're too smart to mess that up. In sport, when you've got a chance to go from "the man" to the next "the man" you take it.
 
Reactions: Koronin
Jun 15, 2020
55
24
230
You have to be a little bit delusional to have/expect the latest two winners of the TDF, ride as domestiques for the guy who won 3 years ago, is now 35, and has had a serious (possibly career ending) crash and hasn't raced since then.
There's nothing you owe in pro sports. You do whatever you think gives you the best shot at winning (hopefully within the rules). Anything else is romantic fans building their narratives.
That s what i said, everybody agrees with me that the best rider between thomas,bernal and froome, if all of them are at 100%, it s froome, so he is their best shot and should be the leader. But, i repeat, if froome recovers. If not, bernal should be the leader. Ineos will know before the tour, who is in best shape, they will have the numbers of froome and bernal. After that, they just have to chose the leader, and the other should be domestique.
 
That s what i said, everybody agrees with me that the best rider between thomas,bernal and froome, if all of them are at 100%, it s froome, so he is their best shot and should be the leader. But, i repeat, if froome recovers. If not, bernal should be the leader. Ineos will know before the tour, who is in best shape, they will have the numbers of froome and bernal. After that, they just have to chose the leader, and the other should be domestique.
We don't know what Froome's 100% can be anymore.
 
That s what i said, everybody agrees with me that the best rider between thomas,bernal and froome, if all of them are at 100%, it s froome, so he is their best shot and should be the leader. But, i repeat, if froome recovers. If not, bernal should be the leader. Ineos will know before the tour, who is in best shape, they will have the numbers of froome and bernal. After that, they just have to chose the leader, and the other should be domestique.

i thing they already have...
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
F Professional Road Racing 68

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS