• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

CMS Doping in sport revelations/discussion

Page 44 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
You got anything other than personal abuse or has the Bat-signal merely brought you here so you could try pick a fight, again?
You got anything other than personal abuse or has the Bat-signal merely brought you here so you could try pick a fight, again?
the irony of you complaining about 'abuse' when all you do on this forum is bully others.
 
loving the smashed laptop....nothing to see here :p:p
But UKAD had access to it? Do we know if access to it means they could see everything...or might there be stuff they didn't see? This is brilliant...sits beautifully with the current Ineos GT success story of 2020.....roll on the Vuelta...would be great to come full circle with 'froomey'....
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jacques (7 ch)
Sounds like he read Which\Computer Magazine on what to do with your broken laptop before taking to the dump. Basically find the hardrive location and, hammer a screwdriver through it so the metal disc inside it shatters. All that stuff you put in the electric skip at the dump ends up in places in the world working with toxic chemicals and cheap labour can extract the rare metals and hard drives get their data sold to dark web for personal data extraction.
 
Sounds like he read Which\Computer Magazine on what to do with your broken laptop before taking to the dump. Basically find the hardrive location and, hammer a screwdriver through it so the metal disc inside it shatters. All that stuff you put in the electric skip at the dump ends up in places in the world working with toxic chemicals and cheap labour can extract the rare metals and hard drives get their data sold to dark web for personal data extraction.
lol....sounds like he listened to Murdoch's lawyers...destroy the evidence lol
 
No, but UKAD enquiry completed saying no evidence was found and returned the laptop according to Freeman yesterday. I don't think UKAD ever said the laptop he gave them was damaged at the time did they? Hard to tell just from some tweets, but sounds like, UKAD returned laptop, it didn't work due to faulty keyboard, so he looked up how to recycle old laptops and then read about how the laptops you take to recycling centres end up in far east to get the data extracted to sell to the dark web I assume. Screwdriver through hard drive guarantees this can't happen. If the laptop doesn't work-enough to format the drive, screwdriver is one of the advise methods by data recovery experts if you have no specialist equipment.
 
I see the usual suspect gravy train sycophants haven't said anything about this. Only one retweet by Moore and that's it. Says everything.
They covered it in the podcast yesterday. Remember Moore had the Sutton bullying Freeman story, way before this was even in the world. Said Freeman changed his mind after the interviews and wouldn't give the permission to publish it for fear of Sutton. I'm sure once this is over Moore will revisit that though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MartinGT
Ha ha Ha - I've posted all along that if Dr Freeman gets done by UKAD ( which is few steps away ) it will be as a medical practitioner employed by a sporting team who is storing prohibited substances on premises.
Technically it's only prohibited if intended for athletes without justification. For Sutton, WADA's 2.6.2 doesn't actually apply to Freemans order anyway. GMC's QC was actually wrong, claiming under 2.6.2. Freeman would need justification for ordering testogel for even Sutton and the fact Freeman wasn't aware he was in fact allowed to order prohibited substances for Sutton without it being subject to WADA, doesn't actually change his motive for re. Sutton anyway.
 
Technically it's only prohibited if intended for athletes without justification. For Sutton, WADA's 2.6.2 doesn't actually apply to Freemans order anyway. GMC's QC was actually wrong, claiming under 2.6.2. Freeman would need justification for ordering testogel for even Sutton and the fact Freeman wasn't aware he was in fact allowed to order prohibited substances for Sutton without it being subject to WADA, doesn't actually change his motive for re. Sutton anyway.
lols...you mean his claimed motive..... what's funnier than the testimony are those who give it any credence.....sometimes the dog does eat the homework eh sam? ;);).....
 
Freeman's lack of knowledge within 2.6.2 makes no difference to Freeman ordering Testogel for Sutton. 2.6.2 only applies to athletes IC and OOC and I'm pretty sure Freeman knows Testosterone is on the prohibited list for athletes without even reading it - anyone does by default. So unless GMC have an athlete it does relate to, they only have a belief it wasn't for Sutton based soley on Sutton saying it wasn't for him. The panel is going to need a bit more than that to make a decision with based on Sutton is actually a proven bully with several others already, which supports Freeman more than you think lol!
 
  • Like
Reactions: pastronef
That was simply confusion over Battista's reply to his email and him thinking he sent it to Battista not receiving it. It doesn't even make sense to me how Jackson was suggesting Battista joking to Freeman he ordered it for himself due to a 100m rash was a message to Freeman he was in trouble with Peters over the order? Freeman at a bit of a disadvantage over emails because GMC have access to them, Freeman doesn't he has to reply to Jackson based on his memory of 9 years ago. I couldn't even remember one detail like a one line joke from that long ago.
 
That was simply confusion over Battista's reply to his email and him thinking he sent it to Battista not receiving it. It doesn't even make sense to me how Jackson was suggesting Battista joking to Freeman he ordered it for himself due to a 100m rash was a message to Freeman he was in trouble with Peters over the order? Freeman at a bit of a disadvantage over emails because GMC have access to them, Freeman doesn't he has to reply to Jackson based on his memory of 9 years ago. I couldn't even remember one detail like a one line joke from that long ago.
yup...quite simple isn't it...so probably no reason to stress about it...and yet.... ;) oh what a tangled web........
 
  • Like
Reactions: red_flanders

TRENDING THREADS