- Jul 5, 2010
- 462
- 0
- 0
sniper said:indeed let's get rid of the phantom idea that criticizing Spanish (anti-)doping policies has anything to do with anti-Spanish sentiments. It doesn't.
Señor_Contador said:Notice I never said anything pointing in that direction.
For me it's still a sports problem. For some it's a problem that takes place only in Spain. When I correct you I am not doing so because I think you're anti-Spanish, I am merely correcting you because you're wrong.
la.margna said:Sorry for my ignorance, but whether 1yr, 2yr or no ban - the Tour de France win gets cancelled anyway as he tested positive on a banned substance, am I right?
BroDeal said:This whole thing is due to WADA's incompetence. Having no minimum threshold on a substance with known food contamination issues is stupid. It ensares the innocent who travel to places like Mexico, and it allows the guilty in countries without contamination problems to claim that they too are victims. The Cologne lab warned that the ever more sensitive limits of detection could causes problems. WADA did nothing. Now the anti-doping framework looks foolish and unfair.
Dr. Maserati said:Not quite - CAS will only rule on the case (if there is an appeal).
It is WADA who sets the rules and criteria - this is a high profile case that has stunk from the outset and WADA have been closely monitoring it.
Both the UCI (by keeping the case quiet even after the A&B had returned positive) and the RFEC drawing this case out and checking the temperature of public opinion by putting out various conclusions.
BroDeal said:This whole thing is due to WADA's incompetence. Having no minimum threshold on a substance with known food contamination issues is stupid. It ensares the innocent who travel to places like Mexico, and it allows the guilty in countries without contamination problems to claim that they too are victims. The Cologne lab warned that the ever more sensitive limits of detection could causes problems. WADA did nothing. Now the anti-doping framework looks foolish and unfair.
BroDeal said:This whole thing is due to WADA's incompetence. Having no minimum threshold on a substance with known food contamination issues is stupid. It ensares the innocent who travel to places like Mexico, and it allows the guilty in countries without contamination problems to claim that they too are victims. The Cologne lab warned that the ever more sensitive limits of detection could causes problems. WADA did nothing. Now the anti-doping framework looks foolish and unfair.
The Hitch said:Lets hope the same for Ricco![]()
The Hitch said:Also i think Contador is a better ambassador for the sport than Andrew
Barrus said:In this case, as far as we know, a ban would be most appropriate, he had a substance in his test sample and there was strict liability, it is only right he would be banned.
Boeing said:Let him race.
hrotha said:No wonder we don't get to organize World Cups and Olympic Games.
Moose McKnuckles said:Susan, this is the Clinic. We don't wait for official word. Official word waits for us.
Andynonomous said:A lot of partisans have been cheering this (alleged) decision. But this is what many of us expected from the severely corrupt Spanish system.
This DOES NOT reflect well on Spain, or it's people.
BroDeal said:This whole thing is due to WADA's incompetence. Having no minimum threshold on a substance with known food contamination issues is stupid. It ensares the innocent who travel to places like Mexico, and it allows the guilty in countries without contamination problems to claim that they too are victims. The Cologne lab warned that the ever more sensitive limits of detection could causes problems. WADA did nothing. Now the anti-doping framework looks foolish and unfair.
this is only one of two generic issues, connected to the case, that wada needs to sort out..another one is further relaxation/refinement to the strict liability principle.Publicus said:+1. Hopefully WADA sorts this out going forward, because as the testing gets more precise, I suspect this will continue to be a problem.
spalco said:I honestly can't believe there are still people here who believe Contador's riduculous beef defense.
It's one thing to say you don't care if he's doped and you want him acquitted because you like to see him ride (and win I suppose), but please don't pretend to be that gullible and think everybody else is stupid enough to buy it.
BroDeal said:This whole thing is due to WADA's incompetence. Having no minimum threshold on a substance with known food contamination issues is stupid. It ensares the innocent who travel to places like Mexico, and it allows the guilty in countries without contamination problems to claim that they too are victims. The Cologne lab warned that the ever more sensitive limits of detection could causes problems. WADA did nothing. Now the anti-doping framework looks foolish and unfair.
Ryo Hazuki said:thank you, best thing said in this thread yet. contador being the scapegoat from a failing wada is unfair
