I completely understand that was the public message, but the public doesn't vote for UCI presidents. The UCI answers to no one. Particularly you and I.BradCantona said:That was essentially his campaign message, hence stressing the importance of independence from anti-doping testing, and a fresh start following McQuaid.
Obfuscating doping sanctions is a step forward?BradCantona said:unless you're expecting miracles that was never going to be achieved in less than a year
Sadly, you've bought the entire "independence" argument from Cookson and we know it to be a farce already. If Cookson was really after transparency and protecting the integrity of the sport the only thing needed would be to grant NADO's the power to open cases on their own. That's not happened and there are too many reason why it won't.