The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Moondance said:On a circuit the wind doesn't play a massive difference.
Moondance said:Ownage by Durbridge.
Wonder if this was a bigger margin of victory than Malori in Varese? Anyone know?
Tuarts said:Durbridge reached 456 watts
Don't forget the Dutchies! All riders (i.e. two) in the top-10.Moondance said:Dayum, 3 Aussies in the Top 10. Their land is truly girt by sea.
theyoungest said:Don't forget the Dutchies! All riders (i.e. two) in the top-10.
And Hamelink truly collapsed, right Dekker_T?
Again, that's not what I call a collapse. Or you expected him to win this thing?Dekker_Tifosi said:Faster than Hepburn and Vorobev at the first split and then finishing almost a minute behind.
Yeah I can't see that as a collapse
Its too hard to admit you are wrong this time, theyoungest??
theyoungest said:Again, that's not what I call a collapse. Or you expected him to win this thing?
El Pistolero said:Average for the whole course?
I know Cancellara once did 565 watts average for 8km at a Tour prologue.
Tuarts said:I don't know how (watts) this works but from the way he said it may be he reached that at max power output or is it a cumulative total?
Tuarts said:I don't know how (watts) this works but from the way he said it may be he reached that at max power output or is it a cumulative total?
Tuarts said:Excellent time from Vorobev. Should medal or get very close with that.
LOL. Hepburn on a GE bike.