Off to a great start gang. Pretending that we can behave like normal is gonna get people killed.
Back near the end of April, when GA was about to open up, I pointed out that it would be interesting to compare that state with MI, which has about the same population. At that time, MI, which had stricter measures, looked much worse, and lockdown opponents were using that as ammunition:
GA: 26,264 cases, 1132 deaths
MI: 44,882 cases, 3951 deaths
Since the beginning of May, though, GA has had almost four times as many cases as MI:
GA: 190,332 cases
MI: 51,844 cases
Beginning a month later, the deaths began piling up. Since the beginning of June:
GA: 2146 deaths
MI: 792 deaths
This is the cost of pretending that the virus doesn't exist, which some supporters of GA were practically implying. GA has been lucky, in that the median age of confirmed cases has dropped from about 50-55 to 35-40, a trend generally seen throughout the south and west. This has kept mortality rates relatively low.
Meanwhile, the HCQ crowd keeps pushing. The latest is this graph purporting to show that countries that encourage use of it to treat COVID have much lower case fatality rates than countries that ban or discourage the use of the drug:
https://techstartups.com/2020/07/23...ssociation-american-physicians-surgeons-says/
I spent some time looking into this, then it dawned on me. The high CFR countries on the left, the red bars, have mostly aging populations. Eleven of the 13 have > 65 populations of > 14%, and 9/13 are >18%. In contrast, 18/25 of the low CFR nations, the green bars on the right, have > 65 populations of < 10%. As you would expect, the correlation of proportion over 65 with any mortality rate is high.
It's also worth noting that in France, when HCQ prescriptions went through the roof in late March--in some parts of the country, a 70-fold increase over pre-pandemic, the CFR was 6.75%. France banned the use of the drug for COVID in late May. In April, when it could still be used, the CFR nearly quadrupled, to 27%, and at the end of May, it had levelled off at about 19%. Since then, with no HCQ, the CFR has dropped a little. There are similar stories in Belgium and Italy, which also banned the drug at that time, and in England and the Netherlands, which stopped recruiting subjects for trials in June, because of the lack of evidence that the drug worked. A slight decrease or no change in CFR since then.
Then there's the U.S., where the CFR has dropped dramatically in the two months since theFDA revoked the emergency use of HCQ for COVID. That drop is clearly because the median age of positives has dropped, as noted above.
That graph by Gummibear is typical of internet "science" these days. Someone posts one graph showing an interesting correlation, and assumes it proves some important relationship about COVID. A typical scientific article will contain maybe 6-10 such figures, and even then, the article will rarely settle the issue. Dozens of studies may be necessary, or at least several large ones, as is the case with HCQ.
It's depressing that AAPS actually have promoted this as evidence that HCQ works. But then, doctors are not scientists, at least not necessarily so. They're trained to apply prophylactic and therapeutic tools to patients, but not to evaluate these tools. Their observations of clinical cases are crucial data, but they don't necessarily know how to interpret those data.
A big problem in particular with HCQ is that people claim it has to be given early after infection. But only about 10% of confirmed cases require hospitalization, and maybe now only 1-2% of the people die. So even a control group will show 90% or more people not hospitalized, and in the high 90s of people not dying. So you need very large numbers to show a difference wrt an experimental group. Most of the studies touted by HCQ proponents don't meet this standard. In the link I posted, it's claimed that 91.7% of patients treated with HCQ improved, and only about 3% died. But how many untreated people improve, and how many die?
It's also claimed that zinc is the key anti-viral, and HCQ just enables the metal ion to get into cells. But then why not use a much safer, OTC drug like quercetin, which has been reported to have the same effect?