- Jul 9, 2010
- 85
- 0
- 0
Nah, don't fix it then I can score double points all seasoningsve said:You have who dat (Who Dat) twice in that list...
Nah, don't fix it then I can score double points all seasoningsve said:You have who dat (Who Dat) twice in that list...
auscyclefan94 said:Good luck with that. You seriously think Dowsett will be doing spectacular rides and beating seasoned pros?
auscyclefan94 said:i see phinney and matthews getting as many chances as any neo pro at htc or saxo has been given. BMC are making a special bike specifically for phinney for the track. Quite of few of BMC's bikes won some big awards and they are known to be top bikes.
joy118118 said:He and Cam will go to Berlin six-day and worlds track. This means not much point until May. From an article, i think i read it in cyclingnews, he said htc gave him a lot freedom to continue track. He has the talent. Hope he not waste it.
Kazistuta said:Saw this thread a couple of days ago and decided to put in a team. Even though Hugo has decided to put a limit on the number of participants, I'll post my team to claim bragging rights, when it turns out this team is the most improved
CAVENDISH Mark 1241
ANTON HERNANDEZ Igor 952
BOONEN Tom 777
BALLAN Alessandro 474
TAARAMÄE Rein 383
WIGGINS Bradley 376
CHICCHI Francesco 287
HAUSSLER Heinrich 251
CATALDO Dario 230
NAPOLITANO Danilo 223
NUYENS Nick 220
GALIMZYANOV Denis 193
HAEDO Lucas Sebastian 189
BOS Theo 182
GODDAERT Kristof 171
VANSUMMEREN Johan 147
QUINZIATO Manuel 144
GERRANS Simon 140
KROON Karsten 130
VANDE VELDE Christian 90
MARYCZ Jaroslaw 88
PAUWELS Serge 87
KASHECHKIN Andrey 84
MASCIARELLI Francesco 66
PELLIZOTTI Franco 60
CLEMENT Stef 54
STEENSEN André 54
SOLER HERNANDEZ Juan Mauricio 47
GOMEZ MARCHANTE Jose Angel 44
SEELDRAEYERS Kevin 40
IMPEY Daryl 39
JEANNESSON Arnold 26
KRITSKIY Timofey 0
Arnout said:Where can I see if my team is accepted (I sent it via PM)?
Kazistuta said:KRITSKIY Timofey 0
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:nice one, wish i had got him.
Kazistuta said:Well, I read about the potential bargain buys in Cobo and Stybar, decided I wouldn't pick either one of them, and then I had to find another one by myselfWould be surprised if noone else "remembers" him.
Really hope that Kritskiy gets some succes next season, he deserves it after his lack of luck in 2010.
tgsgirl said:Hi Hugo, can I still join?
1 Tom Boonen 777
2 Heinrich Haussler 251
3 Martijn Maaskant 118
4 Kevin Seeldraeyers 40
5 Laurens Ten Dam 97
6 Marco Bandiera 21
7 Brice Feillu 70
8 Amets Txurruka 75
9 Simon Gerrans 140
10 Phillip Deignan 5
11 Sylvain Chavanel 533
12 Jussi Veikkanen 127
13 Niki Terpstra 369
14 Michael van Staeyen 300
15 Damiano Cunego 659
16 Fabian Wegmann 475
17 Paul Martens 463
18 Przemyslaw Niemiec 426
19 Mark Cavendish 1241
20 Johnny Hoogerland 452
21 Yoann Offredo 304
22 Nelson Oliviera 150
23 Serge Pauwels 87
24 Francesco Chicci 287
25 Bruno Pires 28
SPENT 7495
LEFT 5
AVERAGE 299,8
LukeSchmid said:Huge Effort Hugo, well done on getting this altogether. Should be fun
Barrus said:Huga, you need to add 182 points at mine, I think you missed Theo Bos in my list
Hugo Koblet said:Sure! Just send your team with the names according to CQ Ranking, like this:
BOONEN Tom
HAUSSLER Heinrich
etc.
That really eases the effort needed to be put into this by me![]()
Hugo Koblet said:Alright.
I think we're ready for the 2011 season.
I have now uploaded the spreadsheet we will be using to keep track of the score board (unless something better comes up or something is very wrong with this).
Here's how it works:
The first sheet named "Rankings" shows a list of all the teams ranked in order. The leader is at the top and so on. The 2010 points shows the value of the team in the 2010 season, and the 2011 points shows the teams points this (next) season. Total point rank shows what place each team is in. Gain/loss shows how much profit the team has made (or lost!) in the 2011 season compared to the 2010 season.
The next sheets shows the individual teams. Each team has got their own sheet. This is because I thought it was a bit confusing and badly arranged if all teams were just thrown in one single sheet. Each sheet shows the same as the "Rankings" sheet: 2010 points, 2011 points and Gain/loss.
That's actually it. Don't mind the last 3 sheets named "Teams", "2010 Results" and "2011 Results".
Note: In the spreadsheet uploaded I have inserted the 2009 points in the 2011 points row. This was just to test if it works, but I thought I might as well keep it there - that way you can all see how it works
Now since I've been a bit busy the last days there will probably be a few minor mistakes in the various teams. I therefore request you all to go check your team to see if I've made any errors. Also please notice if your team value exceeds 7500.
If anyone notices anything in the spreadsheet that doesn't work please let me know. Also if I've made any minor spelling errors in your name, or the text size isn't the same in every sheet. Yes, I'm a bit perfectionist
Here's a list of team registered. If you aren't in the list but have already send your team, let me know.
Arnout
auscyclefan94
auto de fé
Barrus
bicing
Bumeington
Contre la montre
deValtos
Erik8-A
Ferminal
hrotha
Hugo Koblet
ingsve
jaiying
Jancouver
Jan the Man
jens_attacks
joy118118
Jpettersen
Jukebox
Kazistuta
kurtinsc
Kvinto
Libertine Seguros
LukeSchmid
mc_mountain
Mellow Velo
Moncoutie
Moondance
nvpacchi
pabryan
Parrulo
roundabout
Rocksteady
Spider1964
TeamSkyFans
The Cobra
The Hitch
Timmy-loves-Rabo
togo95
Vonn Brinkman
whittashau
who dat
And here's the spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B7...hlNjAtYmIxMmNmOTNlNTMz&hl=en&authkey=CMij_fYO
Jiaying said:I find you made a mistake on my user name.It's Jiaying,not jaiying
kurtinsc said:It is interesting to see who seemed to focus on teams made up of riders who got better last season in the hopes that they'd continue improving (guys who are at the bottom of the rankings... thus showing an increase from 2009 to 2010) and those who focused more on guys who had off years last year in hopes of a rebound (guys at the front of the rankings who had a lot more points in 2009 then they did this past year).
kurtinsc said:It is interesting to see who seemed to focus on teams made up of riders who got better last season in the hopes that they'd continue improving (guys who are at the bottom of the rankings... thus showing an increase from 2009 to 2010) and those who focused more on guys who had off years last year in hopes of a rebound (guys at the front of the rankings who had a lot more points in 2009 then they did this past year).
