CQ ranking

Page 45 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 31, 2010
77
0
0
EvansIsTheBest said:
I gain one place :)
Good Qatar start for me : Boom + Boonen + Haussler = 62 points in two stages :cool:

I'm glad I have Boom + Boonen + Haussler + Renshaw. Scored the Trifecta today. Where do I collect? ;)

This game has definitely increased my interest in not only watching the Pro's but getting on the bike myself.
 
Jan 18, 2010
3,059
0
0
Handbrake said:
I'm glad I have Boom + Boonen + Haussler + Renshaw. Scored the Trifecta today. Where do I collect? ;)

This game has definitely increased my interest in not only watching the Pro's but getting on the bike myself.

same here- I hit the jackpot yesterday in Qatar and locked out the podium and even Degenkolb came second in mallorca. Then the bad news about Ricco took the shine off things. :(

I never realised there were so many pro races in February..
 
sublimit said:
I never realised there were so many pro races in February..

'Tis the season of the .1 races.
Take the weekend after next.
We have Oman, Volta Algarve, (both with Eurosport highlights) Tour de Haut Var, Ruta Del Sol and the first "serious" 1 day semi classic, Trofeo Laigueglia.

End of Feb/ early March there are more races than you can shake a stick at.
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
Mellow Velo said:
'Tis the season of the .1 races.
Take the weekend after next.
We have Oman, Volta Algarve, (both with Eurosport highlights) Tour de Haut Var, Ruta Del Sol and the first "serious" 1 day semi classic, Trofeo Laigueglia.

End of Feb/ early March there are more races than you can shake a stick at.

early season, even march-april has a ridiculous amount of races.
Tis the reason why i love it so much :D
 
theyoungest said:
Do you know who scored CQ-points today? It's the zero-pointer we all love! (well, not love, but I guess most of us have him in our team)

It's Cobo! 8th in Mallorca.

Better yet!!! Duran was 2nd. I think I'm alone with having him last time I checked.

And it's only like a 3rd of us that has Cobo.
 
Apr 1, 2010
459
0
0
3 good days in a row. 2 Farrar wins, A Haussler win (but everyone has him) and Hesjay comes up with a 6th in Mallorca (great considering his big points will come later when he wins Amstel, F-W and LBL:D).
 
Nov 17, 2009
2,388
0
0
So how many points for a win?

I think I might have been the only one who thought Ben Hermans would have a breakout year. My thought process was that he'd start to get more opportunities with the Shack riders getting even more elderly... and so far so good.

He had 59 points from the TDU plus whatever he gets for today. 223 cost... I think he might turn into a very good buy.
 
kurtinsc said:
So how many points for a win?

I think I might have been the only one who thought Ben Hermans would have a breakout year. My thought process was that he'd start to get more opportunities with the Shack riders getting even more elderly... and so far so good.

He had 59 points from the TDU plus whatever he gets for today. 223 cost... I think he might turn into a very good buy.

Ya, it seems like he might be a go to guy for them this year. He will probably get to race all classics he wants as well. Good pick.
 
ingsve said:
And it's only like a 3rd of us that has Cobo.

Significantly more than a third unfortunately. 36 out of 88. 40% It was only 10% or so when it started as i recall.

But the worst one is Haussler. He was such an obvious pick that about 85% of people have him. Hence im totaly impartial to him.

Actually in this case i want him to lose as i want Boonen to take some points instead.
 
Nov 17, 2009
2,388
0
0
jaylew said:
Di Luca with 24 points today. Unfortunately I didn't think about him and it's probably going to cost me. Cataldo finally on the board, which is good.

80 points for the win today, Kurt.

Wow... 80's a pretty big haul. He's nearly at the point where he'd be my 3rd rider with more points then last year. So far it's Cobo and Swift.
 
The Hitch said:
Significantly more than a third unfortunately. 36 out of 88. 40% It was only 10% or so when it started as i recall.

But the worst one is Haussler. He was such an obvious pick that about 85% of people have him. Hence im totaly impartial to him.

Actually in this case i want him to lose as i want Boonen to take some points instead.

Well, I knew it was 30 something from around 90 entrants so "one third" seemed like a good estimate. Stlll a big chunk that doesn't have him. It's not like Haussler who is completely irrelevant in this game.
 
Everybody wins. Cobo was manna from heaven. Haussler back on track.
However exciting these points may seem, I reckon to be successful,
a CQ team has to win 40 points per day for the entire racing season!
Kinda puts it into perspective.

Condolences to all those who gambled and lost on Ricco, btw.:eek:
 
The Hitch said:
Significantly more than a third unfortunately. 36 out of 88. 40% It was only 10% or so when it started as i recall.

But the worst one is Haussler. He was such an obvious pick that about 85% of people have him. Hence im totaly impartial to him.

Actually in this case i want him to lose as i want Boonen to take some points instead.
Terrible day. I have Cobo, but I completely forgot about Haussler. And I have Riccò. :\
 
Mellow Velo said:
Everybody wins. Cobo was manna from heaven. Haussler back on track.
However exciting these points may seem, I reckon to be successful,
a CQ team has to win 40 points per day for the entire racing season!
Kinda puts it into perspective.

Alternatively, its entirely possible for someone to get huge points on a single day with 2000 points on 24th July being one such possibility.

Those who suggest the current leaders are running away with it should bare this in mind.

Thats before you consider the gold mine that having these guys in the top 10 of several mountain stages in the preceeding week brings.

So you could go 2 and a half months without a point, then be right back in it.

Condolences to all those who gambled and lost on Ricco, btw.:

It was a gamble no doubt. But is he definately out?:eek:
 
Nov 17, 2009
2,388
0
0
Was Ricco a great buy even assuming he was going to ride the whole season?

I ask because I saw the 756 point cost and was scared away. His best full year was 1136.

Didn't seem to be enough upside to me. The one I really waffled on was DiLuca. I think at the time there was some question about him signing and I just passed on him. Bad mistake I guess.
 
hrotha said:
Terrible day. I have Cobo, but I completely forgot about Haussler. And I have Riccò. :\

:eek:

You are one of the people who didnt get Haussler. :eek:

Riccos all right. A lot of people have him. 42 actually so your far from the only one missing out. But missing out on Haussler looks very very unfortunate.If i were in your shoes i would leave now and join another forum for a year.


I hear this one is good http://forodeciclismo.mforos.com/30984-el-salon-ciclismo-de-carretera-masculino-profesional/;)

Me i just stopped short of Ricco based on my "dont have too many expensive riders" policy. But he was next on the list.

I definately saw him as a better buy than Anton. Now it looks to be completely the other way.
 
Mellow Velo said:
CONI?
I would think there is no way back, given today's news.
Anyhow, anymore and this thread will get dumped into the clinic,
where it would die an agonizing death, so I think it's time to
invoke Omerta on the subject.;)

Even though its beneficial for me cq wise for Ricco not to score points, i would still much rather have him at the Giro.

Even if it cost me the game, i really wanted to see Ricco vs Anton vs Nibali vs Di Luca vs Menchov vs Rujano vs Purito etc.

Really wanted to see him:mad:
 
kurtinsc said:
Was Ricco a great buy even assuming he was going to ride the whole season?

I ask because I saw the 756 point cost and was scared away. His best full year was 1136.

Didn't seem to be enough upside to me. The one I really waffled on was DiLuca. I think at the time there was some question about him signing and I just passed on him. Bad mistake I guess.

No, I never saw him as a good buy. Since we know that his best season was fueled by CERA it's unknown how good he would actually be now. Also since he did have a decent last year and that he would be up against thougher opponents this year then I would say that a marginal gain on his cost was the best he could do. Plus the fact that the Red Cobra investigation is still not closed made him even in fanger of being a 0 pointer.
 
ingsve said:
No, I never saw him as a good buy. Since we know that his best season was fueled by CERA it's unknown how good he would actually be now. Also since he did have a decent last year and that he would be up against thougher opponents this year then I would say that a marginal gain on his cost was the best he could do. Plus the fact that the Red Cobra investigation is still not closed made him even in fanger of being a 0 pointer.

On the other hand, previous dopers have been able to mount succesful comebacks. There is no reason why he couldnt do it. Also Ricco is the type of GT rider who performs in other races, gets top 10's does well in stages, hence perfect for cq.

More over doing the Giro, it was possible he would later do the Vuelta, or at least some italian classics. So Ricco definately had the potential for points.

You are right about the operation CObra though. People are clearly out to get Ricco so he was a potential 0 pointer. More so than others.

His biggest problem was simply that he cost too much for a uncertain return. Its always a risk to pay 500+ for somebody. But with Boonen and Cunego you are buying guys who clearly had an off season, and who time and time and time again get 1000 +. Ricco only ever had 1000 + once.
 
Nov 17, 2009
2,388
0
0
The Hitch said:
On the other hand, previous dopers have been able to mount succesful comebacks. There is no reason why he couldnt do it. Also Ricco is the type of GT rider who performs in other races, gets top 10's does well in stages, hence perfect for cq.

More over doing the Giro, it was possible he would later do the Vuelta, or at least some italian classics. So Ricco definately had the potential for points.

You are right about the operation CObra though. People are clearly out to get Ricco so he was a potential 0 pointer. More so than others.

His biggest problem was simply that he cost too much for a uncertain return. Its always a risk to pay 500+ for somebody. But with Boonen and Cunego you are buying guys who clearly had an off season, and who time and time and time again get 1000 +. Ricco only ever had 1000 + once.

Yes they have... but I guess the question is "how successful"?

The biggest issue for me with Ricco was the cost. How many dopers coming off a suspension surpassed 750 CQ points? Is it pretty much just Basso and Vino?