Did it? We lost GC contenders earlier in Tours past. Maybe we should all put them in a climate controlled chamber for pure power to weight ratio. Simpler and no accidentsAs expected. Stage 5 didn't disappoint. It killed of the Tour early.
Did it? We lost GC contenders earlier in Tours past. Maybe we should all put them in a climate controlled chamber for pure power to weight ratio. Simpler and no accidentsAs expected. Stage 5 didn't disappoint. It killed of the Tour early.
Did it? We lost GC contenders earlier in Tours past.
There's a difference between not racing and just having a *** demolition derby nuking half the contenders before any "racing" is doneDid it? We lost GC contenders earlier in Tours past. Maybe we should all put them in a climate controlled chamber for pure power to weight ratio. Simpler and no accidents
O'Connor was the other GC contender out of the picture after today.We lost two riders - a guy who has one GT top 10 in his career (a podium which he acquired because a rival who had been stronger throughout the race had a pajará and then an epic tantrum on the penultimate day of the race) in Haig, and a guy who isn't a GC rider in the slightest in Gogl.
Climbers down at the back of the results sheet are people like Verona, Storer and Zeits. Guys like Froome and Woods should be stagehunters so losing time is no problem to them, and riders like Majka, Kuss and Kruijswijk are going to be domestiques later in the race anyway. Really, the only thing here is that Roglič lost time and, sure, the Tour might be over for him... but if it isn't, then he still lost less than 2 minutes, and if the race is over because one rider lost a minute 50 on stage 5 then we may as well just quit now.
Fair point, I overlooked him on first glance. Although he still only lost three minutes, it wasn't like this was 2014.O'Connor was the other GC contender out of the picture after today.
Yeah, various teams said the same.Benji Naesen said a moto.
O'Connor would have had the same impact on the GC fight as Mas.Yeah well, who cares if Ben O Connor loses 3 minutes. That will probably just make the race better aa theres one less rider to hold on for dear life until getting dropped.
Primoz is the big hit, but then again, we might get to see a better race this way as long as hes not injured and feeling fine.
Im just glad Mas didnt crash as he has done in virtually every race he entered this season.
After his Tour last year and his performance in for example the Dauphiné this year, it's hard to believe he gets as much freedom as last year.O’Connor was 4’56 down after stage 5 last year and finished 4th. He’s only 4’34 down after today so a podium is on the cards for sure
basically podium in the bagO’Connor was 4’56 down after stage 5 last year and finished 4th. He’s only 4’34 down after today so a podium is on the cards for sure
I'd have a single race radio feed only, one directional so both hands are on handlebars. I'd include a dedicated organisers motorbike deployed 100yds infront of the first group on the road of more than 10 riders (smaller groups have better visibility). This bike would be responsible for calling out road furniture, sharp bends and narrowing roads and saying 'caution' as an advisory to riders if there was an elevated risk. There would be no requirement for riders to slow down but at least they'd be forewarned.
Bump.
Wait. They actually added a speed bump. At the end of a bunch sprint stage?
No comment.
Who the hell is conducting these course risk assessments?I recently talked to some colleagues about road pro cycling, and they admitted they do not watch cycling too often, but when they watch, they watch to also see some spectacular crashes.
It is a difficult issue.
Hein Verbruggen once said riders dope because the spectators want to see the highest possible average speeds. Just like Doping, crashes are an evil of pro cycling. An evil which always was and certainly always will be part of pro cycling.
You could organize all future races on airport landing strips, that would make it a little bit safer.
One also should not deny that there are many very good bike handlers in the peloton, who love difficult, tricky, dangerous roads, because they handle the bike well, are young and aggressive, and are some kind of addicted to these moments, when the adrenaline kicks in.
And the fans seem to love the atmosphere, when riders pass directly in front of them, going 60 kms per hour, on a downhill pave sector.
I for myself accept this, somehow - just like I accept any other evil aspect of pro cycling. The only ones who make me cry are guys like Sanroma, Weylandt, Lambrecht, who do not deserve what destiny did do to them…![]()
Who the hell is conducting these course risk assessments?
'It's time safety is taken seriously' says Belgian veteran
How would it know when to engage the airbag? They have like this for life jackets but they engage when you enter the water.Due to Tour delivering on stage 5 my motivation to discuss safety during such race was rather low. As Vuelta started and this is the first rest day. Taking into the account all the sensible arguments from this thread and while being focused on collarbone protection. Fixed brace type of collarbone protection isn't best suited for pro road cycling. Adding some material like foam wouldn't do. As the forces involved are too big. The solution must be on-demand, adequate and to be activated in the case of a crash. We already have such technology in cars and motorcycles. Some vests for cycling started to emerge a few years back.
![]()
Page Not Found - Helite
en.helite.com
This solution might not offer "full protection" as it doesn't extended to shoulders. What it does show is that you can already pack an airbag solution into a rather small package. Solutions do already exist that offer more protection:
![]()
![]()
New Backpack Deploys Airbags to Protect Bicycle Riders in Accidents
Electronic sensors detect fall from bike and inflate football-style shoulder pads for upper-torso protectionwww.smithsonianmag.com
Using such system the number of collarbone related injuries would drop substantially. Just like it did in other sports when started to being used. But the current offering is too big to be regarded as suitable for pro peloton. The target is a casual commuter. As the challenge was "show me a solution for cycling that would reduce the number of collarbone injuries". And that was achieved.
The challenges still involved in regards to pro road cycling are to scale down this solution and to make it suitable for pro peloton. Here i feel that the pressure should be put on cycling apparel manufacturers. As currently they are selling equipment that doesn't offer any protection against such type of injuries. Beyond some mild road rash prevention. Once things get into motion each new generation will be more suitable for pro road cycling. I imagine that the transition phase to go from usage on some stages or sections to full time usage. Once the technology will be there. As for that to make much more sense in compared to not wearing it and risking such type of injuries and down time.