- Jul 10, 2014
- 14,994
- 25,994
- 28,180
Why would he go out to lose time on stage 2, which is a stage he might actually be able to win? There’s plenty of other stages for him to lose time later in the race, IF he wants to.I think French people can really put their hopes into the Pinot basket, that would be reasonable and can be fun (also emotional and consuming...) and let Alaphilippe do his thing (whatever that may be, but if I was him I would lose a lot of time on stage 2 and then go for stages).
Help me out guys. Gremlins? Lord of the Rings?
Yes don't see him getting much better in the high mountains. Most riders have that ability when they are younger, it's not something that gets developed late,r with a few exceptions. Even someone like Voeckler was better in the high mountains than Ala especially when in yellow !In my opinion, Alaphilippe could just ride Tours for stages, and if there's an especially dreadful Vuelta and now suitable WC for him, then maybe he should consider it.
what exectly has Roglic done to be "to hot" right now; all he does is outsprint Bernal
Winning GTs is not about being the strongest climber every time the road goes up.He was the strongest climber on one single shortened stage.
I mentioned it in the Buchmann thread. He lost time to Pinot on every single uphll finish in the first two weeks. Take away the TTT and he is 14s behind Buchmann after stage 17. Take away stage 19 and he gained a few seconds on the Galibier and the following downhill. That´s it. And that wasn´t really about strength. More about Ineos having the numbers.
I agree that Bernal is one of the biggest favorites to win the Tour but I don´t think that he is levels above riders like Pinot, Buchmann or even Landa.
Help me out guys. Gremlins? Lord of the Rings?
He's been very underwhelming this year, so let's see this Tour.Winning GTs is not about being the strongest climber every time the road goes up.
The reason why Bernal is considered levels above those guys you mention, and rightly so, is consistency.
He's the best GT rider we've seen at his age in a long time (sorrry Andy), he won the Tour at 22. He can't be overrated.
Froome is the old Froome, the one he was before he started winning.
Underwhelming compared to whom? To Roglic maybe, but we did know even before 2020 that Roglic is by far the best one week stage racer out there (Remco is making a case though).He's been very underwhelming this year, so let's see this Tour.
His attack yesterday gave me shades of 2013 Contador.Underwhelming compared to whom? To Roglic maybe, but we did know even before 2020 that Roglic is by far the best one week stage racer out there (Remco is making a case though).
To all of the others I see mentioned as Tour contenders? Has Pinot been better than Bernal this year because he outsprinted him yesterday?
Besides, this is a very odd season. Results have to be taken with a grain of salt. We have no idea how riders endured the lockdown period and both north and south American riders are probably still worried on a personal/familiar level by COVID-19. I won't make conclusions on a rider overall talent based on this season's performances.
The storm is the reason why he finished among the last riders.Does anybody know what happened to Cosnefroy? Has he fallen ill? I was quite surprised to see him let go already on the penultimate climb and he ended up third last, more than half an hour down (maybe those times are a bit weird, considering the hail storm, but still).
The storm is the reason why he finished among the last riders.
Regarding his abilities, Cosnefroy is really not much more than a very punchy guy who excels at attacking on hilly terrain.
I wasn't expecting him to fight for the stage win yesterday but if Hirschi can make a top 20 on a stage like that, I would have expected Cosnefroy to have been near him - not being dropped on a pretty easy climb where the peloton still consisted of 80 riders or so.
And the worrying thing for me was that he really looked like a guy who gave his all when he was dropped.
 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		
 
				
		