Escarabajo said:I thought everyone knew what Cunego's problem is. Start drinking that good tomatoes’ juice from 2004 and he'll be a force to reckon with.
Otherwise. NO WAY. Not a chance.
He can talk to Horner and get a good advice on how to become an excellent climber as you get older.
Later he went to the Tour and had a good performance. After that everything was completely gone. So it was not only the Giro. After 2006 he faded away in GT I think.El Pistolero said:You mean the Giro were Petacchi won 9 stages and Robbie 3?
Escarabajo said:Later he went to the Tour and had a good performance. After that everything was completely gone. So it was not only the Giro. After 2006 he faded away in GT I think.
Fair enough.El Pistolero said:Meh, he can and always could top 10 in most GTs I think, but that's not what people expect from you when you win Lombardia and the Giro at age 22. The reason for his Giro win is probably a combination of clinic stuff and the route of that Giro. But not just clinic stuff as that would mean you assume all the others were clean. And with all due respect, that's not a very sane thing to think![]()
What? No, that's preposterous. There's better programs, better responders and people who take more risks.El Pistolero said:Meh, he can and always could top 10 in most GTs I think, but that's not what people expect from you when you win Lombardia and the Giro at age 22. The reason for his Giro win is probably a combination of clinic stuff and the route of that Giro. But not just clinic stuff as that would mean you assume all the others were clean. And with all due respect, that's not a very sane thing to think![]()
Sasquatch said:Cunego can easily get top 10.
The course this year is not hard. Wiggins will probably get top 10 again on this course.
Kruijswijk backing up from the Giro can get top 10.
The course is not hard therefore it is very possible that Cunego can finish high up.
Escarabajo said:Later he went to the Tour and had a good performance. After that everything was completely gone. So it was not only the Giro. After 2006 he faded away in GT I think.
indeed, gonchar 2nd, mcgee 7th, cioni 4th etceteraRyo Hazuki said:he already faded away in giro 2005. 2004 was his only forte as top gc rider against horrible competition on horrible course
Dekker_Tifosi said:indeed, gonchar 2nd, mcgee 7th, cioni 4th etcetera
hrotha said:Honchar has been in the top 10 in all kinds of routes. He could climb. As for Indurain, well, considering he was beaten by Berzin...
yeah it was weaker thasn others years, simoni was not in form ata ll and finished 3rd, he focussed on tour that year.El Pistolero said:The competition wasn't weaker compared to other years that Giro, it's just that the course sucked so these man finished up high. Gonchar, one of the best time trial specialists in his time... Tells a lot about the route.
In fact, the Giro has always had weak competition during the Armstrong era. Contador was the first foreign to win the Giro in 2008 since Miguel Indurain... Since then the competition has picked up a little bit more again with Menchov winning and Contador winning again for a second time. Also Di Luca that nearly got beaten by Antoinette in 2007.
As for Lance Armsgtrong, he's an idiot. Could easily have done the double in 2004, but now he'll always be remembered as someone who just won the Tour. Could have had a much more impressive palmares.
El Pistolero said:Ow yeah just checked, first since 1996 thenStupid Russians
![]()
But doesn't change my point about weak competition at Giro during Armstrong era though.
And yes he could climb, but for him to come second and finish in front of Simoni(who thrived in the steep stuff), you know the route wasn't all that mountainous.
The Russians do seem to do well at the Giro though. Menchov, Tonkov, Berzin. If it's not an Italian, it's a Russian or Spaniard![]()
You don't need to convince me, I remember when Unai Osa was 3rd.El Pistolero said:But doesn't change my point about weak competition at Giro during Armstrong era though.