I can't understand why Millar is so respected.
I've read his book, followed his career. I understand that his fall from grace led to the second act where he reinvented himself as an anti-doping crusader but I don't buy any of it.
Millar's book painted the picture of an entitled, capricious talent faced with a Hobson's choice - dope 'because everyone was doing it', or leave cycling.
It's the same bull**** argument made by all exposed dopers. Look at Hincapie et al. Their statements upon being banned from competition were practically 'copy and paste' replicas of each other. "Sorry to our friends and family; we were faced with a choice to either join everyone else and dope to compete or leave the sport."
Guess what? Bassons left the sport. Countless others never got the chance to even enter the sport because of dopers. I haven't read one account by a doper where they truly own their actions. Hamilton got close with his book, and whilst I have disdain for him as a rider, I respect the fact that he admits it was his decision to dope, his alone.
Yet here they all are; making a living out of cycling still. In the excellent BBC 5 Live radio documentary on doping in cycling "Peddlers", Millar demurely bandys around the idea of being in charge of some sort of truth and reconcilliation! When I heard it, all I could think of was "Are you ****ing Kidding me???" I don't know where Millar gets off acting like some born again anti-doping crusader. After his actions he should work quietly in the background to fight doping; but he can't, he has to be one of the sports 'personalities'. His ego needs it.
Read Nicole Cooke's valedictorian speech on her retirement and tell me the hairs on your neck aren't standing up from the power of her feelings.
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/jan/14/nicole-cooke-retirement-statement
Sorry if this is a bit of a rant, but it's something I feel very strongly about.