euphrades said:
This thread is silly and stupid. Floyd screwed up because he left the testosterone patch on for too long. The rumor I heard is that he fell asleep with it on and it caused the levels to be too high.
Where do people get this stuff?
Epicycle said:
I never bought that theory. I remember what happened on the stage and even watched it again a year or so ago when I was going through old tapes. The problem is that even a normally doped rider should die at the end of of 125km solo....
"Normally doped". I like it. I may have not gotten every factoid correct, but I think people aren't looking at the big picture from that Tour.
Blackcat. I probably am giving Floyd too much credit, but part of that is for having a big engine and a lot of talent, and motivation, and being a damned good technical rider who employed a good strategy. Things everyone dismisses and discounts. Part of my "defense" is that it's a widely repeated assumption that Floyd tanked on Stage 16, then covered his scrotum with a testosterone patch in a desperate attempt to come back, and that gave him the energy he needed to make that long break. It's just a ridiculous and absurd notion. And even if it were true, such an attempt at doping would not have given him that gain, and shown with the T:E ratio he had.
As I stated before, I am convinced he doped, throughout the Tour. It's the "normal" thing to to at this level. Either with his own blood, or some form of carrier or expander. But even then, he, and many of the others, were probably near their pinnacle of what they could do and get away with. So to think that Floyd dumped a liter of blood in his system and didn't have any values that threw up red flags, or test over the 50% hct when he probably already was near it, just doesn't make sense either.
Keep another thing in mind. Presuming what Kohl said is true, and blood doping takes 48 hours to take full effect, it makes little sense that Floyd would tank after Stage 16 as badly as he did, do a big fill-up that night, and 14 hours later be so jacked that he could launch the attack he did. Especially considering that Kloden, Rasmussen, Sinkewitz etc. were very, very likely on their own refined programs as well. Did Floyd really all of a sudden dope
that much better?
I've said before many times, the guy doped. I'm sure of it. He, and especially his legal and management team, behaved in an abhorrent manner that cost him his hide when CAS ruled on his case and fined him, and rightfully so. But I think it's both peculiar and hypocritical that because he's
the guy that tested positive at the Tour (barely), that somehow he's
the guy that doped, and he is
the cheater and bad guy. Implying somehow the others were clean or something, or that he had little talent otherwise; so we need to make sure we continually rail against him and drive him into the mud, while practically ignoring the big picture. Both his actual abilities on the bike, and the systemic, sport-wide doping that was taking place during the time he was racing, and likely still exists today.