compete_clean said:
What disturbs me about this post is it shows just how much the needle has moved since I raced. There was time when we thought that a guy was a complete tool/degenerate if he had to dope to be provincial road race champ. And that was stimulants - not hormones.
Times have changed. People with disposable income are driving the PED market in the states, fueled by vanity, a monumental sense of entitlement and the desire to turn back the hands of time.
This is a societal issue, and not just relegated to the ranks of no-talent amateur cyclists who want to accomplish feats they cannot attain naturally.
What I find abhorrent is the attitudes of dopers who throw their accomplishments in others' faces as if they had any kind of natural talent, or as if their feats during the last group ride were the results of "hard work" and nothing else. This happens on the micro level in CAT-whatever races all over the US.
And the fact of the matter is, there are many cyclists who don't dope only because they cannot access the drugs, not out of some contrived sporting element of fair play that only exists in some people's minds.
compete_clean said:
We could understand someone who was riding full time or going to Europe to race but doping for anything short of national/pro races seemed laughable.
Laughable to you but true. By the way, you'd have a better chance of finding Bigfoot than knowing which one of your riding buddies is riding with a testosterone patch on his arm. The veil of secrecy can only be revealed if you are one of the insiders, and that is a hermetically sealed group for sure, for a variety of reasons.