Re: Re:
Renato Canova stated it as fact in a Runner's World article. It's in "Renato speak" but he makes the association and clearly states it wasn't declared doping at the time. What PEDs Conconi was providing is not known. But, Conconi's lab is legendary for doping, so "one clean athlete" is not likely.
Go ahead and disagree with the assembled facts, the way Coe is acting he's clearly protecting dopers and doping.
In case it hasn't been posted, "EPO cheats out" Radcliffe doesn't want samples tested.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/athletics/33990503
I love her response, "The whole point is you go through your career, you look back and say, 'That was the best I could do,'" Yes, it was Paula. It was a good thing the dope worked really, really, really well.
More Strides than Rides said:luckyboy said:Wasn't Coe rumoured as a Conconi client?
The rumor came from a Race Radio tweet. No follow up, no answers to further questions, and nothing related since.
It may be true, but as it stands now, that rumor is fodder for the defenders, as it is so easy to shoot down.
Renato Canova stated it as fact in a Runner's World article. It's in "Renato speak" but he makes the association and clearly states it wasn't declared doping at the time. What PEDs Conconi was providing is not known. But, Conconi's lab is legendary for doping, so "one clean athlete" is not likely.
Go ahead and disagree with the assembled facts, the way Coe is acting he's clearly protecting dopers and doping.
In case it hasn't been posted, "EPO cheats out" Radcliffe doesn't want samples tested.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/athletics/33990503
I love her response, "The whole point is you go through your career, you look back and say, 'That was the best I could do,'" Yes, it was Paula. It was a good thing the dope worked really, really, really well.