Doping in other sports?

Page 49 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
I am really enjoying watching tv reporters, journalists, and newsreaders, on the vanity drugs. shiny shiny skin? some hgh endogenous pituitary releasing peptide

then the sports newsreaders and commentators, talking about PEDs, when these vanity drugs, would be outlawed in pro sport under WADA statutes

the biggest tell, is when people's physiognomy starts to glow orange like an oompa loompa. then if skins is taught or shiney, hgh,a non-surgical facelift

it is just absurd. pundits and commentators talking about PEDs when they are on sh!t that would be outlawed. shamless, bald faced, or not
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
lol political doping

John-Kerry-Plastic-Surgery-Before-and-After-Photos-Botox-Face-Lift-Facial-fillers-Brow-Lift-and-Nose-job-5.jpg
 
Nevada state athletic commission has given Sonnen until 27 July to respond, else face a revoked license to fight and possible fines of $250,000, plus expenses.

blackcat said:
...that would be some definition of "cortisone neck" yeah?
Corticosteroids (cortisone) do not enhance strength or promote muscle growth. They are catabolic, not anabolic. Catabolic and anabolic are opposites, just like cathodes and anodes are opposites. The most common medical uses for corticosteroids are treating inflammation and autoimmune disorders.

Dosing with sufficient corticosteroids will suppress natural testosterone, with predictable consequences. Give a bull a catabolic steroid and he'd develop heifer's neck.


Anabolic steroids versus catabolic steroids
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
StyrbjornSterki said:
Nevada state athletic commission has given Sonnen until 27 July to respond, else face a revoked license to fight and possible fines of $250,000, plus expenses.


Corticosteroids (cortisone) do not enhance strength or promote muscle growth. They are catabolic, not anabolic. Catabolic and anabolic are opposites, just like cathodes and anodes are opposites. The most common medical uses for corticosteroids are treating inflammation and autoimmune disorders.

Dosing with sufficient corticosteroids will suppress natural testosterone, with predictable consequences. Give a bull a catabolic steroid and he'd develop heifer's neck.


Anabolic steroids versus catabolic steroids
i know cortisone/corticosteroids/corticoids/antinflammatories are catabolic.

not the point. In about 95 when he was with Ferrari at Motorola LAnce came back after off-season from Austin to a preseason camp, and they game him a nickname cortisone neck ;)

it will be clear with my posts i am well aware of cortisone and these class of steroid
 
proffate said:
retired NBA players reminisce about the drugs they took to play basketball: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DypUbTHsTh8#t=399

This is a grossly negligent misrepresentation of this video and the concomitant suggestion or intended message that there was/is widespread drug use in basketball in order "to play basketball"

The vast majority of the video deals with 7 former NBA players as to the reasons they retired. At the end of the video, Steve Kerr mentions for the last 2 seasons of his career he took Vioxx.

Vioxx is an anti-inflammatory, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and not a narcotic. Although in the video Kerr says he "thinks" it was a PED, Kerr is wrong. It is not a performance enhancing drug. It has never been on the WADA list of performance enhancing drugs. It was pulled from the market in 2004 because it was linked to heart disease and strokes.

It was an effective anti-inflammatory and pain reliever that brought relief for pain as would aspirin, ibuprofen or naproxen, other NSAIDs all over the counter meds in North America. that are not banned and used by athletes routinely, because they provide relief, but not a performance enhancing benefit. Vioxx did require a prescription.

A second player, Isiah Thomas refers to having taken DMSO or Dimethyl sulfoxide during his career. In medicine, DMSO is predominantly used as a topical analgesic, as an anti-inflammatory, and an antioxidant. Similarly DMSO is not a PED, has never been on the WADA list of prohibited drugs and is not performance enhancing

Of the 7 players in the video only these 2 mentioned anything about drugs they took for pain relief. None of the others "reminisced about drugs they took "to play basketball"

Dear Wiggo

Thanks for the vid! A good example of why doping should not ever be condoned or encouraged:

This comment is the classic example of how when one poster misrepresents a drug as a PED when they are not, another poster in ignorance assumes and proposes the drugs referred to constitute doping when it did not.

At the same time I agree with Dear Wiggo that doping(actual doping, not the use of drugs that are not prohibited) should never be condoned or encouraged.
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
RobbieCanuck said:
This is a grossly negligent misrepresentation of this video and the concomitant suggestion or intended message that there was/is widespread drug use in basketball in order "to play basketball"

No, it isn't. It's a precis about the video discussion at the point of the video linked.
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
RobbieCanuck said:
This comment is the classic example of how when one poster misrepresents a drug as a PED when they are not, another poster in ignorance assumes and proposes the drugs referred to constitute doping when it did not.

You must love being wrong, or inaccurate at best.

There have been more than a few here stating, "let them dope".

In fact one blog linked by you as one of your "research" sources, RobbieCanuck, suggested that exact same thing, citing "doctors are involved anyway" as part of the argument for this ridiculous attitude towards doping.

My comment is: if a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory can pass muster via FDA and then be shown, after years of use, to cause the issues Vioxx did, then the drugs that are used for PEDs are potentially just as likely to do the same, if not worse, due to their typically more potent effect on the body. Despite doctors and FDA involvement, the less drugs athletes take, the better, safer and more healthy they will probably be.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Almeisan said:
So this is equivalent to an IQ test? Cycling and weightlifting the lowest IQ, tennis and pentathlon the highest?

I think it has to do with federations. I believe the Tennis Federation just totally ignore the PEDs.
 
May 2, 2010
1,692
0
0
Benotti69 said:
I think it has to do with federations. I believe the Tennis Federation just totally ignore the PEDs.

I think that's probably the answer as to why they appear as one of the 5 'cleanest' sports.
 
Dec 30, 2010
850
0
0
The numbers can be "fixed" by the sporting authorities in many ways. For example, tennis only tests samples for a limited number of drugs. If another sport tests samples for more prohibited substances, it's percentage of positives could be higher than tennis's, even if it is a cleaner sport.

Again, tennis is doing a better PR job, not a better job of keeping PEDs out.

Here is the head of the ITF, Ricci Bitti :

“We have to protect the integrity of tennis, but our attitude on the sports side is that a positive doping case is a sad day. The attitude of the other side, as we see with Richard Pound, is that it is a celebration. It is a different mentality.”


So, in other words, fighting against PEDs, is strictly a PR exercise.