i wasn't available when the loginov positive hit the news. so, i spent some time this morning trying to make sense of it, based both on what has been released
officially and
other more or less reliable facts..
being always skeptical of the incompetent/hyped/biased msm reports, the 1st thing i did was to go to the prime source - the ibu site. the is nothing there about the loginov postive. nothing. ZERO.
then, the next thing to figure out was WHY did it take a full year ?
i am not impervious to a theory that the eastern europeans are treated with bias. they probably are. but in THIS case the answer could be as benign as it is simple - the NEW governing wada document (TD2014EPO) to which the labs have to legally stick...
became effective less than 3 months ago . on 1 september 2014.
I just read it. among other things, it relaxed the confirmation criteria in certain atypical cases that previously would NOT have been positive. what the media attributed to the ibu officials saying about the retesting of loginov and his russian doping 'sisters' is consistent with the new wada guidence.
was loginov relentlessly hunted down ?
almost certainly, yes. he had been tested 16 (!) times for epo AFTER the 26 november, 2013 test that failed him. by any measure, this is an enormous expenditure of the ibu resources on a
single athlete. someone less lazy than i could prolly extract more stats and compare them to the ibu testing pool and the total # of tests. they were after loginov as there was noone else to test
another cute little fact emerged that loginov's natural haemoglobin is purported to be btwn 17 and 18. true or not, but there is no evidence he had a dispensation...
all around, another sad story about a promising athlete likely let down by the docs lagging behind the latest western micro-dosing techniques...plus, i sense, to make it even more disgusting, it WAS laced with politics.
