Re: Re:
Yeah, I am struggling with not suspecting Olsson, for all the reasons you mention, but also because of his stories of isolating himself from his family, living alone in a cabin training, to sacrifice it all for another gold. Either he is heroic (not so heroic sacrificing one's family, though…), or doing like many other liars; overelaborating his lie. The Veerpalu comparison is pretty spot on, when it comes to performance. Having said that, I am still a fan and will let someone else prove me wrong. That 50 km 2013 I actually file in the ONE focused push category, where the rest of the field were acting immature not making even an improvised coordinated effort to close the gap. Olsson broke away, skied in perfect conditions, alone, doing his own race, his preferred modus operandi. That race is remarkable, but not in the Mühlegg/MJS/Ustiugov category.
Being a Swedish cross country fan thruogh the 90's, it was all a very prolonged wtf?-moment. How come all other nations are so good? Why are Swedes suddenly crap? I have the same feeling this season. Looking through World Cup, World Championship and Olympics results over the last 40 years, Swedish performance was stellar in the 80's, crap in 90's, again stellar in early 00's, then crap late 00's, then again stellar (in the championships) in the early 10's. In the 90's and 00's, Swedish performance follows an inversed curve of EPO-usage. The 90's saw heavy EPO use. Early 00's saw the the introduction of EPO-testing, followed in late 00's by more advanced microdosing usage of EPO and similar PED's. More rigorous blood passports were introduced in the final years of the 00's, right? Google fails me when trying to confirm that for cross country skiing. From early 10's I don't really know, someone help me out… Anyway, in hindsight I sincerely believe that the Swedes raced clean(er) through the 90's and 00's, and the fan boy in me wants to believe that still is the case. But for Olsson, it looks kind of weird. Kalla after 2012 Norwegian training, suspicious. Emelie Öhrstig, coming from a career in cycling, taking a World Championship gold in sprint 2005, quitting 2006, that never felt quite right. There's probably more Swedish weirdness, mainly the Sochi success, but those races seem so convoluted in regards to PED's, that I hardly even have an opinion.
BullsFan22 said:You forgot Olsson's 2010 Olympic Skiathlon performance, and Olsson's 2012 Nove Mesto performance (in fact, that entire season raises eyebrows-veerpalu would have been proud of racing about 5 wc races in a season and winning 3 of them), and Olsson's 2013 15km and especially 50km, the now legendary race where he led for close 40 km and skied alone after Cologna fell for, what, 30-35 km? In 2014 he again barely raced, citing illness and not being sure if he would even go to Sochi to race at all, then wins two medals. Last year he did the same exact thing, this time winning 3 medals. One of them a gold, in the 15km skate. This guy is either one of the most mentally tough, most talented, most confident athletes that has ever lived or he took a few pages out of Muehlegg and Veerpalu's books. I actually like the guy, he is relatively modest and doesn't ask for favors and let's his skiing do the talking. That said, he has had some of the more eye opening performances of the past five or six years.
Yeah, I am struggling with not suspecting Olsson, for all the reasons you mention, but also because of his stories of isolating himself from his family, living alone in a cabin training, to sacrifice it all for another gold. Either he is heroic (not so heroic sacrificing one's family, though…), or doing like many other liars; overelaborating his lie. The Veerpalu comparison is pretty spot on, when it comes to performance. Having said that, I am still a fan and will let someone else prove me wrong. That 50 km 2013 I actually file in the ONE focused push category, where the rest of the field were acting immature not making even an improvised coordinated effort to close the gap. Olsson broke away, skied in perfect conditions, alone, doing his own race, his preferred modus operandi. That race is remarkable, but not in the Mühlegg/MJS/Ustiugov category.
Being a Swedish cross country fan thruogh the 90's, it was all a very prolonged wtf?-moment. How come all other nations are so good? Why are Swedes suddenly crap? I have the same feeling this season. Looking through World Cup, World Championship and Olympics results over the last 40 years, Swedish performance was stellar in the 80's, crap in 90's, again stellar in early 00's, then crap late 00's, then again stellar (in the championships) in the early 10's. In the 90's and 00's, Swedish performance follows an inversed curve of EPO-usage. The 90's saw heavy EPO use. Early 00's saw the the introduction of EPO-testing, followed in late 00's by more advanced microdosing usage of EPO and similar PED's. More rigorous blood passports were introduced in the final years of the 00's, right? Google fails me when trying to confirm that for cross country skiing. From early 10's I don't really know, someone help me out… Anyway, in hindsight I sincerely believe that the Swedes raced clean(er) through the 90's and 00's, and the fan boy in me wants to believe that still is the case. But for Olsson, it looks kind of weird. Kalla after 2012 Norwegian training, suspicious. Emelie Öhrstig, coming from a career in cycling, taking a World Championship gold in sprint 2005, quitting 2006, that never felt quite right. There's probably more Swedish weirdness, mainly the Sochi success, but those races seem so convoluted in regards to PED's, that I hardly even have an opinion.