Dwars Door Vlaanderen

Page 9 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
deValtos said:
Just looking from QS's perspective statistically it would appear better to have 3 options from 13 than 1 from 5. I always find these situations a little odd.

Terpstra and Stybar should've done more to stop anyone coming across to Lamp/Sep when it was just those two,
Yeah. I find their tactics a bit odd too. Another Steppers fail?

Lampaert is the weakest on paper in a sprint. If Lampaert gets 5th in the sprint was it really worth it to "save" Terpstra and Stybar? Two of the best classics riders in the world.
 
Velolover2 said:
deValtos said:
Just looking from QS's perspective statistically it would appear better to have 3 options from 13 than 1 from 5. I always find these situations a little odd.

Terpstra and Stybar should've done more to stop anyone coming across to Lamp/Sep when it was just those two,
Yeah. I find their tactics a bit odd too. Another Steppers fail?

Lampaert is the weakest on paper in a sprint. If Lampaert gets 5th in the sprint was it really worth it to "save" Terpstra and Stybar? Two of the best classics riders in the world.
You've got to let Lampaert have his shot at winning sometimes though. At least if you want to keep such a talented rider happy to stay with the team.
 
Aug 6, 2015
4,139
2
0
Re: Re:

jaylew said:
portugal11 said:
this is the difference between hilly classics like and cobbled classics. in cobbled classics you need to be the smartest to win. in hilly you just need to be the strongest
Agree for the most part. I would add that there is also more of a luck factor in the cobbled classics. The randomness is part of what makes them more fun to watch.
I agree. these days, ardennes are so predictable. 99% of the times, it is all about the last 1 km.