Yeah. I find their tactics a bit odd too. Another Steppers fail?deValtos said:Just looking from QS's perspective statistically it would appear better to have 3 options from 13 than 1 from 5. I always find these situations a little odd.
Terpstra and Stybar should've done more to stop anyone coming across to Lamp/Sep when it was just those two,
hfer07 said:just tuned in -
So Don Alejandro is the 2nd group chasing the leaders....
Interesting :surprised:
You've got to let Lampaert have his shot at winning sometimes though. At least if you want to keep such a talented rider happy to stay with the team.Velolover2 said:Yeah. I find their tactics a bit odd too. Another Steppers fail?deValtos said:Just looking from QS's perspective statistically it would appear better to have 3 options from 13 than 1 from 5. I always find these situations a little odd.
Terpstra and Stybar should've done more to stop anyone coming across to Lamp/Sep when it was just those two,
Lampaert is the weakest on paper in a sprint. If Lampaert gets 5th in the sprint was it really worth it to "save" Terpstra and Stybar? Two of the best classics riders in the world.
Yeah, I don't really get QS's tactics.Bardamu said:Only chance for Lampaert to win is by sneaking away on the cobbles?
Samamba said:hfer07 said:just tuned in -
So Don Alejandro is the 2nd group chasing the leaders....
Interesting :surprised:
Chasing isn't the word I would use to describe what Valverde is doing right now.
I agree. these days, ardennes are so predictable. 99% of the times, it is all about the last 1 km.jaylew said:Agree for the most part. I would add that there is also more of a luck factor in the cobbled classics. The randomness is part of what makes them more fun to watch.portugal11 said:this is the difference between hilly classics like and cobbled classics. in cobbled classics you need to be the smartest to win. in hilly you just need to be the strongest