Dwars Door Vlaanderen

Page 8 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 24, 2015
1,938
758
12,680
Idk why Lampaert is doing so much work.

He's gonna finish last if that group stays together.

Velolover2 said:
Degenkolb not taking any pulls. Too spend?
Is Degenkolb there? Stuyven and Pedersen I thought.
 
Apr 12, 2015
7,060
1,204
20,680
Re:

Breh said:
Idk why Lampaert is doing so much work.

He's gonna finish last if that group stays together.

Velolover2 said:
Degenkolb not taking any pulls. Too spend?
Is Degenkolb there? Stuyven and Pedersen I thought.
Aaah, that's why. Pedersen is in the lead group.
 
Apr 17, 2013
6,494
431
18,580
Re:

Velolover2 said:
Degenkolb not taking any pulls. Too spend?
It's Stuyven in the chase group. Mads P is up front, so he's not taking any turns. Same with the QS guys in the chase group
 
Aug 6, 2015
4,139
2
0
this is the difference between hilly classics like and cobbled classics. in cobbled classics you need to be the smartest to win. in hilly you just need to be the strongest
 
May 10, 2015
13,618
12,919
28,180
Valverde being a bit of a pussy now.
He's acting like he has a teammate in front.
Same with that Roosen dude.
 
Apr 12, 2015
7,060
1,204
20,680
Re: Re:

Cance > TheRest said:
Velolover2 said:
Degenkolb not taking any pulls. Too spend?
It's Stuyven in the chase group. Mads P is up front, so he's not taking any turns. Same with the QS guys in the chase group
Stuyven for 6th, then. He is fast too.
 

Scarponi

BANNED
Apr 21, 2015
5,135
2,789
23,180
Re:

portugal11 said:
this is the difference between hilly classics like and cobbled classics. in cobbled classics you need to be the smartest to win. in hilly you just need to be the strongest
Would take the strongest any day over the smartest
 
Apr 12, 2015
7,060
1,204
20,680
Re:

Samamba said:
Valverde being a bit of a pussy now.
He's acting like he has a teammate in front.
Same with that Roosen dude.
He is up front now. I think he saw your message. :lol:
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Re:

portugal11 said:
this is the difference between hilly classics like and cobbled classics. in cobbled classics you need to be the smartest to win. in hilly you just need to be the strongest

Exactly.

That's why these riders are better imo. The only exceptions are Nibali and Contador.
 
Apr 12, 2015
7,060
1,204
20,680
Sep and Yves has to try on Nokereberg, otherwise they are going to lose the race.

And Terpstra or Styby should attack as well as a plan B. I don't think Yves is fast enough to win it.
 
May 9, 2010
11,071
2,541
28,180
On paper Hagen is the fastest here but he looks the weakest of the five. Both Teunissen and Pedersen are fast as well, but they are on unknown territory. Vanmarcke looks strong and sprints well after a hard race. Lampaert I have no idea about, but I would guess that he's normally the slowest of the five.
 
Dec 31, 2017
1,301
842
12,680
Is Vanmarcke the best classic rider in the world without the sprint?
He needs to attack now...
 
Mar 19, 2009
9,892
1,790
20,680
Re:

portugal11 said:
this is the difference between hilly classics like and cobbled classics. in cobbled classics you need to be the smartest to win. in hilly you just need to be the strongest
Agree for the most part. I would add that there is also more of a luck factor in the cobbled classics. The randomness is part of what makes them more fun to watch.
 
Nov 7, 2010
8,820
246
17,880
Re:

Hugo Koblet said:
On paper Hagen is the fastest here but he looks the weakest of the five. Both Teunissen and Pedersen are fast as well, but they are on unknown territory. Vanmarcke looks strong and sprints well after a hard race. Lampaert I have no idea about, but I would guess that he's normally the slowest of the five.
Agree with all this, I think Vanmarcke will take it. Either by a late attack or in the sprint.

The one advantage Lampaert has got is he could stop working at some point, with strong riders behind, and try to time a late attack.
 
Feb 10, 2015
5,933
804
19,680
Re:

Hugo Koblet said:
On paper Hagen is the fastest here but he looks the weakest of the five. Both Teunissen and Pedersen are fast as well, but they are on unknown territory. Vanmarcke looks strong and sprints well after a hard race. Lampaert I have no idea about, but I would guess that he's normally the slowest of the five.
He has a decent speed.
 
Apr 12, 2015
7,060
1,204
20,680
Re:

repre said:
Is Vanmarcke the best classic rider in the world without the sprint?
He needs to attack now...
The depressing results of Sep:
2nd Paris - Roubaix ('13)
2x 2nd Gent - Wevelgem in Flanders Fields ('16, '10)
2x 3rd Ronde van Vlaanderen / Tour des Flandres ('16, '14)
2x 3rd Omloop Het Nieuwsblad Elite ('18, '17)
2x 4th Paris - Roubaix ('16, '

Do less for once, Sep! :lol:
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Re: Re:

Scarponi said:
portugal11 said:
this is the difference between hilly classics like and cobbled classics. in cobbled classics you need to be the smartest to win. in hilly you just need to be the strongest
Would take the strongest any day over the smartest

Kwiatkowski has a better palmares than most cyclists in the peloton and he has never been the strongest in a big race he won. Kudos to him.
 
Nov 29, 2010
2,326
0
0
Just looking from QS's perspective statistically it would appear better to have 3 options from 13 than 1 from 5. I always find these situations a little odd.

Terpstra and Stybar should've done more to stop anyone coming across to Lamp/Sep when it was just those two,
 
Jul 5, 2011
3,348
1
13,480
Re: Re:

Alexandre B. said:
Hugo Koblet said:
On paper Hagen is the fastest here but he looks the weakest of the five. Both Teunissen and Pedersen are fast as well, but they are on unknown territory. Vanmarcke looks strong and sprints well after a hard race. Lampaert I have no idea about, but I would guess that he's normally the slowest of the five.
He has a decent speed.

And he's also very strong in **** weather.
 
May 9, 2010
11,071
2,541
28,180
Re:

repre said:
Is Vanmarcke the best classic rider in the world without the sprint?
He needs to attack now...
I'd say that Lampaert is a candidate for the strongest cobbles rider at the moment.
 
Mar 24, 2013
2,806
232
11,880
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
Scarponi said:
portugal11 said:
this is the difference between hilly classics like and cobbled classics. in cobbled classics you need to be the smartest to win. in hilly you just need to be the strongest
Would take the strongest any day over the smartest

Kwiatkowski has a better palmares than most cyclists in the peloton and he has never been the strongest in a big race he won. Kudos to him.

WCRR