My mid size analysis of PN is that in TTT the team was not up to the task and the team will hence need to adapt to this new standard in the future races and not the other way around. It can't be a tactical error, to finish in the same margin as the best teams, at the intermediate. Individually, and that is what is important for this season, Rogla did good in TTT. That means that not only form but the material is good too. While we are at the team, i feel that Bora is impacted by Rogličes arrival and all top riders entered the season in good form. It makes sense to do that, at a race such as PN was, but at the Tour a bigger sacrifice will need to be made, for Rogla, by his teammates. Sticking with Rogla regardless of his perceived form will be a must and he really shouldn't lose seconds, due to his team. As for the management, there i don't expect to hear excuses on social media, on how the legs are good or bad on some stage. Rogla is much much better at answering such questions. Rogla in my opinion was not overweight and had some good form and ambition entering the race. Some smaller race before PN would likely be beneficiary and weather in my opinion did play a role.
As for my short size analysis of PN. Rogla was not in the mood.