Fancy Bears hack ADAMS system

Page 16 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 22, 2010
5,017
1,106
20,680
Re: Re:

DirtyWorks said:
ClassicomanoLuigi said:
If the Bears have the entire WADA email archives, then that makes it a much different ballgame, blows the lid off the organization

I don't know. The content I've read from Fancy Bears suggests at least some of the NADOs like USADA are doing their job.

Email from Reedie has been leaked before and it's clear Reedie's first job is protecting Russia. The way Bach has responded to the whole Russian scandal is telling as well.

In that sense, it's not controversial to suggest at the most senior levels of WADA and the IOC, they want the corruption out of sight, but are otherwise indifferent. So, the lid has been blown off some time ago.

EDIT: You can go back to the Armstrong scandal when Diack and McQuaid were still WADA voting members publicly objecting to USADA's efforts.


The general gist from the Russia scandal is pure politics. When the Americans had the same problem a few years back, they were allowed to compete in Sydney and Athens. Why were they allowed? Hundreds of athletes failing tests and the IOC, USOC, USATF, among others, swiping them under the rug. Where was Travis Tygart, USADA and WADA then? Travis Tygart only came forward after Landis came forward and USADA had no choice because this was prolonged by Novitsky. Tygart telling Russia 'to clean up its act' is hypocritical at best. Landis was made a scapegoat much the same way Ben Johnson was made the scapegoat. Carl Lewis failed a number of tests just before the 1988 Olympics and the USOC and USATF let him compete. Johnson won the 100m with ease, but was stripped of the gold medal a few days later and Lewis was 'given' the gold.

WADA's job is to test athletes. They are essentially an affiliate of the IOC. Their job isn't to ban entire federations. Their job is to do testing for banned substances and detect any foul play that may be going on and report this the national federations, head organizations to which they are connected to (IAAF, UCI, IPC, FIFA, UEFA, FIBA, FINA, FIS, IBU, etc).

All of a sudden the IOC is evil because they are not falling in line to America's demand that Russia be banned from the Olympics (and beyond) because some man that worked for laboratories as the head man for RUSADA for 25 years, and who has a criminal record and a US address since 2011 said so. A ton of athletes are unfairly treated and blasted in Western media simply because he said that Russian athletes are under 'systematic doping' from the state. Everybody sees 'state sponsored doping,' and 'Russia' in a NYT article and they've already made up their decisions that the every Russian dopes, without doing a bit of research themselves. Rodchenkov worked for 25 years in anti-doping labs. He had ample time to leave and report on what he saw.

They are pointing fingers at athletes like Alexander Legkov and Iliya Chernousov, for example, because somehow, they took steroids with a cocktail mix, which they then tested positive for, and those positives samples were exchanged with positive samples in a hole in the wall. So the state told Legkov and Chernousov's coaches, a German and Swiss to take steroids with cocktail and they did, and then told them not to worry about positive tests because they'll take care of it? Where was WADA in Sochi? The laboratories in Sochi and Moscow were 'compliant' during that time, but not after the Olympics? Nobody saw any foul play before and after Sochi with said athletes, only during Sochi? These guys had some of their best results while training well outside Russia, in the EU, but also in Norway, where (from what I hear) the anti-doping was 'compliant,' and that they were well tracked by the ADAMS whereabouts system. FIS was interviewed this Summer on potential anti-doping violations regarding Legkov, after the news first broke in early May, and they confirmed what Legkov said, on the amount of times he was tested, where he was tested, and by whom. He was tested by RUSADA, WADA and FIS anti-doping affiliates. Of course that was all ignored by the American media. They had already made up their mind, without doing any research of their own to compare and see if there are any discrepancies.

The other 'anti-doping' people involved, like Hajo Seppelt, are like the incarnations of David Walsh. Has no problems writing pieces on Russians, but when reports of TUE misuse, potential cover ups and non compliance with UKAD, BC, reports on Salazar, Rupp, Farah and that entire group based in Oregon, recent reports of asthma meds being used en masse by the Norwegian Ski Federation-even by non-asthmatics....he is silent as a mouse. If you go on his Tweeter feed, it's nothing but Russia, Russia, Russia. Is this what an 'independent investigative journalist' does? He was part of the team that set up platforms to inform or send in links of doping stories or events or first hand experience. Wonder what the deal is with that. Is that still going on? To me it seems like he is obsessed with Russia and is making this all about politics.
 
Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Strange that you are not questioning the motivation for Landis to come forward while smearing Rodchenkov using the tired talking points that I've heard many times before in the Russian media.

Or maybe not so strange after all.

And mentioning the criminal record is low even for you when you are very likely to be aware that the case was started after he talked to the media.
 
Jun 22, 2010
5,017
1,106
20,680
roundabout said:
Strange that you are not questioning the motivation for Landis to come forward while smearing Rodchenkov using the tired talking points that I've heard many times before in the Russian media.

Or maybe not so strange after all.

And mentioning the criminal record is low even for you when you are very likely to be aware that the case was started after he talked to the media.

Ok, what was Landis's motivation? What was Rodchenkov's motivation? I didn't question when the case was started, I questioned why it was started and how it was run with political overtones, which the NYT just loves.

What about the rest of what I said? Or will you just cherry pick what I said and call me a 'Russian apologist?' Nothing what I said regarding Legkov, for example, is false.

What have I written in the past to make you say 'is low even for you?'
 
Feb 10, 2010
10,645
20
22,510
Re:

sniper said:
Do Fancybears have Whereabouts information?

It looks like they essentially copied everything off of file storage rather than database access. Whereabouts is all web-based, so dates/locations would be stored in a database table. Those are hard to reach without some obvious credentials found. (database-connection.txt)
 
Mar 25, 2013
5,389
0
0
Re:

gooner said:

From their Facebook post just now.

Greetings citizens of the world. We are #FancyBears'.
We keep on fighting for clean sport! We've got thousands of #WADA's classified documents exposing how awfully corrupt sports officials are. Now, we are ready to share them with journalists standing for clean sport! Get in in touch with us.
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.
Anonymous - #OpOlympics
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Re: Re:

gooner said:
gooner said:

From their Facebook post just now.

Greetings citizens of the world. We are #FancyBears'.
We keep on fighting for clean sport! We've got thousands of #WADA's classified documents exposing how awfully corrupt sports officials are. Now, we are ready to share them with journalists standing for clean sport! Get in in touch with us.
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.
Anonymous - #OpOlympics

Lol! :razz:

David Collins Dear Sirs,
My name is David Collins, I am deputy Insight Editor for the Sunday Times of London. We note with great interest your posting and I would love to communicate with someone from your group? Let me know the best way to go about this - my email address is david.collins@sunday-times.co.uk. I also have email encryption software Mailvelope. Let me know the best way for us to discuss. Below I've put the emails that I've previously sent to the email address on your website - the last email I sent was in October.

Hello,
Emails to fb999xz0ne13@yahoo.com

Email sent from david.collins@sunday-times.co.uk on 21st October

I sent the below email to you on Oct 14th - I wanted to check in again to see if you had considered my offer. Just to communicate, for now? We can do it on an encrypted email platform if you wish?

Hope to hear from someone soon,

Regards,

David

Dear Sirs,

I've been intrigued by your organisation for some time and I'm interested in communicating with someone from your group?

We have done a great deal of work in the past in the areas of corruption in sport, politics and finance. A quick google and you'll see the work of the Insight team of the Sunday Times.

You'll also see we have done stories to do with Russian athletes who have registered suspicious blood values, and have worked in collaboration with ARD and the journalist Hajo Seppelt.

I want to assure you that our work is without agenda or prejudice - we have covered stories not only about Russian athletes doping, but British and Kenyan athletes too. In fact our leaked IAAF database last year carried information about athletes with suspicious blood values from most of the countries who compete in athletics.

In short, we investigate stories which are in the public interest, and our investigations can be about any given subject.

This is why I would like to strike up a dialogue between ourselves - and possibly even meet, although I don't know what the possibilities of this would be?

We could begin, if you are willing, by email or if you I have a Mailvelope for encrypted emails?

Let me know your thoughts.

All the best,
 
Jun 22, 2010
5,017
1,106
20,680
Re: Re:

thehog said:
gooner said:
gooner said:

From their Facebook post just now.

Greetings citizens of the world. We are #FancyBears'.
We keep on fighting for clean sport! We've got thousands of #WADA's classified documents exposing how awfully corrupt sports officials are. Now, we are ready to share them with journalists standing for clean sport! Get in in touch with us.
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.
Anonymous - #OpOlympics

Lol! :razz:

David Collins Dear Sirs,
My name is David Collins, I am deputy Insight Editor for the Sunday Times of London. We note with great interest your posting and I would love to communicate with someone from your group? Let me know the best way to go about this - my email address is david.collins@sunday-times.co.uk. I also have email encryption software Mailvelope. Let me know the best way for us to discuss. Below I've put the emails that I've previously sent to the email address on your website - the last email I sent was in October.

Hello,
Emails to fb999xz0ne13@yahoo.com

Email sent from david.collins@sunday-times.co.uk on 21st October

I sent the below email to you on Oct 14th - I wanted to check in again to see if you had considered my offer. Just to communicate, for now? We can do it on an encrypted email platform if you wish?

Hope to hear from someone soon,

Regards,

David

Dear Sirs,

I've been intrigued by your organisation for some time and I'm interested in communicating with someone from your group?

We have done a great deal of work in the past in the areas of corruption in sport, politics and finance. A quick google and you'll see the work of the Insight team of the Sunday Times.

You'll also see we have done stories to do with Russian athletes who have registered suspicious blood values, and have worked in collaboration with ARD and the journalist Hajo Seppelt.

I want to assure you that our work is without agenda or prejudice - we have covered stories not only about Russian athletes doping, but British and Kenyan athletes too. In fact our leaked IAAF database last year carried information about athletes with suspicious blood values from most of the countries who compete in athletics.

In short, we investigate stories which are in the public interest, and our investigations can be about any given subject.

This is why I would like to strike up a dialogue between ourselves - and possibly even meet, although I don't know what the possibilities of this would be?

We could begin, if you are willing, by email or if you I have a Mailvelope for encrypted emails?

Let me know your thoughts.

All the best,

Is that 'letter' a joke?!?
 
Mar 13, 2013
4,857
903
17,680
I was wondering how long it would be until FancyBears wanted to start making some money out of their hacking by selling to Newspapers.
 
Mar 13, 2013
4,857
903
17,680
Well if it's only going to be as useful as the TUE leaks, it's largely worthless again, which is why the TUE WADA data wasn't sold to the highest bidder I assume. All they did really did was conflate athletes and TUEs. Apart from that, it was great for internet forums and twitter, pretty worthless in terms of anti-doping or slurring non-Russian athletes whatever their main objective really was for hacking the data.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
With all respect, that you don't see the worth of the information says more about you than about the information.
Whatever you think of it, Fancybears' output has been vastly more informative about professional athletic performances than the (psuedo)scientific output of most sports scientists from the last ten to twenty years combined. (not counting rare exceptions like Ashenden)
 
Mar 25, 2013
5,389
0
0
They may got heat upon Wiggins, but releasing athletes' medical records is nothing to be proud of.

How anyone can defend what happened to Simone Biles is beyond me.

If it's anything like that they want to continue with, I hope they go away for good.

Instead we got a song and dance from people saying this was great stuff.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
How anyone can defend what is happening and has happened to clean athletes on a daily basis for several decades now is beyond me.

Keep it coming Fancybears.
 
Mar 25, 2013
5,389
0
0
Re:

sniper said:
How anyone can defend what is happening and has happened to clean athletes on a daily basis for several decades now is beyond me.

Keep it coming Fancybears.

Simone Biles???

Could you give me this long list of athletes that they have "exposed"? (Leaving Wiggins aside)
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Re:

samhocking said:
I was wondering how long it would be until FancyBears wanted to start making some money out of their hacking by selling to Newspapers.

Yeah, Russian hackers working for Putin need to make money, lol! :razz: Let's apply western principles to socialist anarchy! You do make me laugh. The Sunday Times, The Times have a strict non-payment clause for stories. They will only pay expenses for interviews or consultancy fees if you're an expert.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re: Re:

gooner said:
sniper said:
How anyone can defend what is happening and has happened to clean athletes on a daily basis for several decades now is beyond me.

Keep it coming Fancybears.

Simone Biles???

Could you give me this long list of athletes that they have "exposed"? (Leaving Wiggins aside)
I don't know about Biles, but if you feel she's a victim, then take it up with the sports governing bodies, IOC and the bunch. Not with Fancy Bears.
The curtain needs to be lifted in order to protect the vast majority of clean athletes against the small minority of cheating athletes. In the process there may be some minor casualties like Biles. But the curtain still needs to be lifted. Fancybears have done their share.
Compared to the rights of clean athletes being violated on a daily basis, Biles' medical privacy being violated is a very minor concern.
 
Jun 22, 2010
5,017
1,106
20,680
Re: Re:

sniper said:
gooner said:
sniper said:
How anyone can defend what is happening and has happened to clean athletes on a daily basis for several decades now is beyond me.

Keep it coming Fancybears.

Simone Biles???

Could you give me this long list of athletes that they have "exposed"? (Leaving Wiggins aside)
I don't know about Biles, but if you feel she's a victim, then take it up with the sports governing bodies, IOC and the bunch. Not with Fancy Bears.
The curtain needs to be lifted in order to protect the vast majority of clean athletes against the small minority of cheating athletes. In the process there may be some minor casualties like Biles. But the curtain still needs to be lifted. Fancybears have done their share.
Compared to the rights of clean athletes being violated on a daily basis, Biles' medical privacy being violated is a very minor concern.


Oooooh, I am not sure about that...
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re: Re:

BullsFan22 said:
sniper said:
gooner said:
sniper said:
How anyone can defend what is happening and has happened to clean athletes on a daily basis for several decades now is beyond me.

Keep it coming Fancybears.

Simone Biles???

Could you give me this long list of athletes that they have "exposed"? (Leaving Wiggins aside)
I don't know about Biles, but if you feel she's a victim, then take it up with the sports governing bodies, IOC and the bunch. Not with Fancy Bears.
The curtain needs to be lifted in order to protect the vast majority of clean athletes against the small minority of cheating athletes. In the process there may be some minor casualties like Biles. But the curtain still needs to be lifted. Fancybears have done their share.
Compared to the rights of clean athletes being violated on a daily basis, Biles' medical privacy being violated is a very minor concern.


Oooooh, I am not sure about that...
mind, I'm not talking about pro's.
I'm talking about the world as a whole.
the twats I play soccer with every sunday are most likely clean. :)
Problem is clean athletes hardly ever become pro.
If you look at pro's and even higher level amateurs, of course the ratio is completely reverse.
 
Jun 22, 2010
5,017
1,106
20,680
Re: Re:

sniper said:
BullsFan22 said:
sniper said:
gooner said:
sniper said:
How anyone can defend what is happening and has happened to clean athletes on a daily basis for several decades now is beyond me.

Keep it coming Fancybears.

Simone Biles???

Could you give me this long list of athletes that they have "exposed"? (Leaving Wiggins aside)
I don't know about Biles, but if you feel she's a victim, then take it up with the sports governing bodies, IOC and the bunch. Not with Fancy Bears.
The curtain needs to be lifted in order to protect the vast majority of clean athletes against the small minority of cheating athletes. In the process there may be some minor casualties like Biles. But the curtain still needs to be lifted. Fancybears have done their share.
Compared to the rights of clean athletes being violated on a daily basis, Biles' medical privacy being violated is a very minor concern.


Oooooh, I am not sure about that...
mind, I'm not talking about pro's.
I'm talking about the world as a whole.
the twats I play soccer with every sunday are most likely clean. :)
Problem is clean athletes hardly ever become pro.
If you look at pro's and even higher level amateurs, of course the ratio is completely reverse.


Fair enough. However, what about those youngsters that have aspirations to move up the ranks and become pro's? Or about the amateurs that want to move up to the big leagues? If they feel like they need to dope to make that next step, will they do it? Will they be put off or overwhelmed by doping once they reach the pro level? What about sponsors?

Yes, I'd like to think that the Sunday morning soccer or basketball or frisbee games are dominated by clean athletes.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Fair enough. However, what about those youngsters that have aspirations to move up the ranks and become pro's? Or about the amateurs that want to move up to the big leagues? If they feel like they need to dope to make that next step, will they do it? Will they be put off or overwhelmed by doping once they reach the pro level? What about sponsors?
yeah, fair point. I don't really have any answers here. As long as there are big pots of money at the end of the rainbow, people will be tempted to cheat in order to arrive there first.
At the very least, as you no doubt agree, there needs to be a demonstrably independent antidoping body. But that's more easily said than done. And even once it's there, it'll be difficult to guarantee that such a body remains incorruptible.
So I don't really know what the way forward is. As long as we embrace capitalism, we embrace cheating, I guess.

Yes, I'd like to think that the Sunday morning soccer or basketball or frisbee games are dominated by clean athletes.
:D
 
Jun 22, 2010
5,017
1,106
20,680
gooner said:
They may got heat upon Wiggins, but releasing athletes' medical records is nothing to be proud of.

How anyone can defend what happened to Simone Biles is beyond me.

If it's anything like that they want to continue with, I hope they go away for good.

Instead we got a song and dance from people saying this was great stuff.


If these professionals have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear. And anyway, what's up with all these professionals being sick or injured, and then literally days or when they come back, are able to dominate or be very near the top after their supposed injuries/illnesses? You don't find that suspicious? Fancybears have exposed this joke of a system. I don't know how familiar you are with asthma meds in pro sports, particularly in xc ski racing, but what we (the fans, current skiers, former skiers, etc) have seen in recent months is that the asthma medication is abused and the system is rotten to the core. Athletes that don't even have asthma are taking the meds and are clearly benefitting from them, whether they have a TUE or NOT. To me it looks like some of those that don't have asthma, are being tested to HAVE asthma by the Norwegian doctors who then prescribe to them the meds. If that isn't blatantly corrupt, I don't know what is. The Norwegian national team coaches are, arrogantly, saying they'll keep that practice. What's to say that isn't happening in other sports, i.e., the sports that were exposed by Fancybears? Funny how Wiggins or Froome have a problem and next thing you know, they are dominating the Romandie or the TDF.