Posting something constructive in such a thread would be nice. Certainly as opposed to inciting alcoholism.
Let's drop that aspect of the conversation and move on please.
Let's drop that aspect of the conversation and move on please.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
patricknd said:kidding aside, it's all really asinine. unless it's a back door method to get info from the former investigation into the public eye, which was my first thought when i saw the initial report, (frighteningly enough i had the same thought as the hog) it's a ridiculous waste of time and money. on the other hand it is pretty entertaining, so what the hell.
Alpe d'Huez said:Posting something constructive in such a thread would be nice. Certainly as opposed to inciting alcoholism.
Let's drop that aspect of the conversation and move on please.
thehog said:Nice fishing Chris. What reaction are you looking for here?
Oh no Floyd is innocent it's not fraud? or Lance was the same, he stole money too....
You really are a one dimension type of guy.
Poor bait.
You'll have to do much better than this to gain a rise.
When did you became so bad. You're posts actually used to be reasonably good.
Step up.
ChrisE said:It's really no more assinine than the clinic cult position in here. Zero credibility from that crowd because they would be howling for his head if RS had given him a job in 2010, and thus he wouldn't have had the urge to soul cleanse lol.
The only reason the clinic cult downplays this investigation is because LA was mean to him. All you have to do is look at the scoreboard on where somebody falls in relation to LA's good graces and you can easily predict what their spineless position will be.
I for one think he should not be prosecuted for my own selfish reasons; stupid people that would contribute to something like that deserve to be screwed over. But, if he used the funds for something other than his defense then it would seem he is SOL per the law, regardless of how bad he hates LA.
ChrisE said:It's really no more assinine than the clinic cult position in here. Zero credibility from that crowd because they would be howling for his head if RS had given him a job in 2010, and thus he wouldn't have had the urge to soul cleanse lol.
The only reason the clinic cult downplays this investigation is because LA was mean to him. All you have to do is look at the scoreboard on where somebody falls in relation to LA's good graces and you can easily predict what their spineless position will be.
I for one think he should not be prosecuted for my own selfish reasons; stupid people that would contribute to something like that deserve to be screwed over. But, if he used the funds for something other than his defense then it would seem he is SOL per the law, regardless of how bad he hates LA.
Caruut said:I find it quite amusing that even when you're making quite a good point, I still find it hard to agree with you, because you just can't seem to help being such a jerk about it.
"Clinic cult". Really? It's as though you don't want people to read what you're saying, and only want them to react angrily.
Obviously if he used the money for something clearly non-defence related, then fraud is on the cards.
Sure, many clinic posters would have a hugely different opinion of Floyd if he'd gotten a job post-ban. You are acting as though what he did when he found out that he couldn't was what most guys do, which it wasn't. He gets respect because unlike other returning dopers who never got a job, he didn't just protect the system anyway, he told what he knew. You know that.
andy1234 said:I for one, am looking forward to the day that Armstrong is revealed to be Floyd Landis's Father.
If my research into stories of Good vs Evil is accurate (which to be fair is limited to Star Wars), this will probably happen next Tuesday, or just after RR hears about it in a Tweet.
Race Radio said:While you are at it maybe you can find something about the story coming out soon on the Floyd case?
Race Radio said:Is this the story your were referring to Race?
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/apr/25/san-diego-grand-jury-investigating-cyclist-landis-/
Thanks for the heads up. Must have heard about it on Twitter
a federal grand jury in San Diego is investigating Landis for possible wire and mail fraud involving the defense fund.
Landis received a “target letter” earlier this month
Assistant U.S. Attorney Phil Halpern, head of the fraud division in San Diego, is pursuing the case against Landis. Halpern also has a racing license with USA Cycling, the sport’s national governing body.
Floyd and I know that there are very experienced lawyers in the San Diego U.S. Attorney’s Office, and we are confident they would do the right thing once they had a complete understanding of all the facts behind anything they might be investigating.”
The fund was not set up as a nonprofit organization,
$700,000, Landis and others have said, came from wealthy donors, several of whom were investors in Tailwind Sports. Landis previously said that Thomas Weisel, Tailwind’s founder and chairman, contributed $50,000 and at least three other Tailwind investors wrote large checks.
“It is absolutely crucial that we encourage athletes to speak out, and to actively participate in the policing of their sport,” Ashenden said in an email. “Shooting the messenger is not just counter productive in that regard, but short-sighted and deluded.”
“This is somebody that took, some would say, close to $1 million from innocent people for his defense under a different premise.
Elagabalus said:I think my mileage is about the same as yours. And it was all going so well ... (except, of course, when Cal Joe started prattling on about tweets being slighted)
Everyone, MarkVW is saying that he does not think the story about Floyd on the CN website is credible. End of.
RR, you decided to name this thread "Floyd to be charged with fraud" yet when we click on the link the title on CN is "Could Floyd Landis face fraud charges??". Leaving it open as to whether Floyd is actually being investigated or whether the story is based solely on rumor. You seem to feel this story is true. Why do you feel that way? Can you share with us any more info (insider or not) or perhaps some links?
I think everyone here agrees that the details surrounding this story are "odd", leading to speculation as to why that might be the case. However, is the "oddness" indicative of dark forces lying beneath or is it that CN simply got it wrong?
Carry on.
Race Radio said:Is this the story your were referring to Race?
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/apr/25/san-diego-grand-jury-investigating-cyclist-landis-/
Thanks for the heads up. Must have heard about it on Twitter
ChrisE said:I for one think he should not be prosecuted for my own selfish reasons; stupid people that would contribute to something like that deserve to be screwed over. But, if he used the funds for something other than his defense then it would seem he is SOL per the law, regardless of how bad he hates LA.
Race Radio said:Thanks for that article Race. Interesting update
Of course Wonderboy had nothing to do with this, but has been pushing the fraud mantra for over a year.
Race Radio said:Wouldn't it be funny if Wonderboy called up some of his friends and encouraged them to send money to Floyd? That would be hilarious! What if he offered to give them some cash that they could donate? Wow that would be interesting!
But of course it would never happen as we all know that our hero is far to ethical to participate in such a fraud.
Race Radio said:Is this the story your were referring to Race?
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/apr/25/san-diego-grand-jury-investigating-cyclist-landis-/
Thanks for the heads up. Must have heard about it on Twitter
Ferminal said:Have any of the larger donators said anything? If Floyd is prosecuted surely they would take civil action?
Ferminal said:Have any of the larger donators said anything? If Floyd is prosecuted surely they would take civil action?
Polish said:Why would they "surely" take civil action?
Doubt if they would. For the same reasons a small donator would probably not take action. Even if donators, large or small, were a-holes and sued Floyd, it would cost more to prosecute than they would end up collecting.
Leave Floyd alone. Seriously.