OMGBolder said:http://www.lemonde.fr/cyclisme/article/2017/12/13/cyclisme-christopher-froome-vise-par-une-procedure-apres-un-controle-antidopage-anormal_5228801_1616656.html
Froome losing a race, getting any sort of a ban, ducks up the entire narrative for them. There would now be a big red flag where Walsh and co swore there are NO red flags and mocked "interent losers," who would suggest there might be.Brullnux said:Same as Ulissi, no? And Ulissi got 9 months with results scrapped from the stage (and gc had he not dropped out). So that means goodbye Giro and a race in tine for the Tour if the uci are consistent.
Can someone put that into English?Pursuant to Article 7.9.1. of the UCI Anti-Doping Rules, the presence of a Specified Substance such as Salbutamol in a sample does not result in the imposition of such mandatory provisional suspension against the rider.
Didn’t Piepoli also get busted for similar amounts to Petacchi but got absolutely no ban whatsoever? Seems they make up the bans as they go along but we knew that anyway.El Pistolero said:Hopefully they burn him to the stake. Petacchi got banned for a year and he had less of it in his urine.
Get rid of the cancer of this sport please.
Nibali the winner of the Vuelta and Vélo d'Or?
Salbutamol doesn't mean a provisional suspension, not important enough.MartinGT said:Can someone put that into English?Pursuant to Article 7.9.1. of the UCI Anti-Doping Rules, the presence of a Specified Substance such as Salbutamol in a sample does not result in the imposition of such mandatory provisional suspension against the rider.
‘All the sky fans’??Dekker_Tifosi said:hahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaahahahahahhaa
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Oh man I'd like to see all the Sky fans now.
I understand you are cynical. Hey we all are. But even with the cynicism, there is a bright light here.MartinGT said:Lets be honest.
Nothing is going to happen to the poster boy.
Yea you're allowed it up to a point so can't really provisionally suspend someone.Brullnux said:Salbutamol doesn't mean a provisional suspension, not important enough.MartinGT said:Can someone put that into English?Pursuant to Article 7.9.1. of the UCI Anti-Doping Rules, the presence of a Specified Substance such as Salbutamol in a sample does not result in the imposition of such mandatory provisional suspension against the rider.
The limit of 1000 ng/ml in the urine is calculated for 16 puffs (16!!!!!)kosmonaut said:How many puffs would you need to take to reach 2000ng/ml?
Must've been a really big effort coming up since he "only uses it before big efforts".
Woah. Most asthmatics I know take 2, sometimes 3 max. I could see an athlete taking more, but 32???Nicosix said:The limit of 1000 ng/ml in the urine is calculated for 16 puffs (16!!!!!)kosmonaut said:How many puffs would you need to take to reach 2000ng/ml?
Must've been a really big effort coming up since he "only uses it before big efforts".
Froome took at least twice that dose!
He's already said some rubbish hasnt he?markene2 said:Wow. Lets see if they can spin this. I assume they can. Froome wont miss the tour no matter what. But i can see him miss the giro.
Nobody has edited it yet. Last update 11 December.The Hitch said:They can even monitor Wikipedia dor247 for eternity to make sure no bad loser ever edits it in there.
I guess...MartinGT said:Lets be honest.
Nothing is going to happen to the poster boy.