The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Who's saying that lol?jsem94 said:He's Kenyan again, never was British lmao.
bigcog said:No wonder he said he was doing the giro knowing full well he wouldn't ... this is a weird one, either rank stupidity or perhaps he thought it being the vuelta he would get away with it. They will probably blame Spanish salbutamol asthma medication.
brownbobby said:heartsnotinit said:For the team's sake they need to have medical records that have already been turned over and stand up to forensic scrutiny.
To a layman, double concentration seems somewhat high even if he was puffing to the limit. Looking at the WADA code that's 8 puffs of a 100 mcg inhaler in a 12 hour period (and 16 puffs in a 24 hour period). If he was using a 200 mcg inhaler by accident, or didn't realise the 8-in-12 part then that could explain it. Other forms still seem to be banned. I wonder now if there's some trick with a spacer to get maximum uptake of salbutamol from 800 mcg.
If I needed that many puffs of an inhaler, I don't think medical advice would be to cycle up a hill.
Sorry but there's no way i'm buying that this was any kind of mistake/accident. This isn't a medication that's new to Froome. As one of the most tested athletes on the planet (stop laughing at the back) you/your medical team simply do not make such fundamental errors.
brownbobby said:bigcog said:No wonder he said he was doing the giro knowing full well he wouldn't ... this is a weird one, either rank stupidity or perhaps he thought it being the vuelta he would get away with it. They will probably blame Spanish salbutamol asthma medication.
Difficult to believe either one really isn't it?
I guess we just have to wait and see what the excuses Sky come out with look like, and then we can take a view on wether or not they're any more or less plausible than the 2 options you present.
I'm guessing plenty of people will have already made up their minds on this one though without needing to see what Sky come out with. Can't fault this really with all the anti trust that they bought upon themselves with the whole jiffy bag sags.
Wiggo's Package said:brownbobby said:bigcog said:No wonder he said he was doing the giro knowing full well he wouldn't ... this is a weird one, either rank stupidity or perhaps he thought it being the vuelta he would get away with it. They will probably blame Spanish salbutamol asthma medication.
Difficult to believe either one really isn't it?
I guess we just have to wait and see what the excuses Sky come out with look like, and then we can take a view on wether or not they're any more or less plausible than the 2 options you present.
I'm guessing plenty of people will have already made up their minds on this one though without needing to see what Sky come out with. Can't fault this really with all the anti trust that they bought upon themselves with the whole jiffy bag sags.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/dec/13/chris-froome-team-sky-reputation-abnormal-drug-test
Brailsfraud has already made clear what Sky's excuses will be...
'The team principal, Sir Dave Brailsford, said: “There are complex medical and physiological issues which affect the metabolism and excretion of Salbutamol. We’re committed to establishing the facts and understanding exactly what happened on this occasion. I have the utmost confidence that Chris followed the medical guidance in managing his asthma symptoms, staying within the permissible dose for salbutamol. Of course, we will do whatever we can to help address these questions.” '
MartinGT said:Wiggo's Package said:brownbobby said:bigcog said:No wonder he said he was doing the giro knowing full well he wouldn't ... this is a weird one, either rank stupidity or perhaps he thought it being the vuelta he would get away with it. They will probably blame Spanish salbutamol asthma medication.
Difficult to believe either one really isn't it?
I guess we just have to wait and see what the excuses Sky come out with look like, and then we can take a view on wether or not they're any more or less plausible than the 2 options you present.
I'm guessing plenty of people will have already made up their minds on this one though without needing to see what Sky come out with. Can't fault this really with all the anti trust that they bought upon themselves with the whole jiffy bag sags.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/dec/13/chris-froome-team-sky-reputation-abnormal-drug-test
Brailsfraud has already made clear what Sky's excuses will be...
'The team principal, Sir Dave Brailsford, said: “There are complex medical and physiological issues which affect the metabolism and excretion of Salbutamol. We’re committed to establishing the facts and understanding exactly what happened on this occasion. I have the utmost confidence that Chris followed the medical guidance in managing his asthma symptoms, staying within the permissible dose for salbutamol. Of course, we will do whatever we can to help address these questions.” '
But hasnt that been proved he didnt
I made up my mind years ago. Don't care what Sky come up with. Just hope he loses the Vuelta - and thus becomes even more taintedbrownbobby said:bigcog said:No wonder he said he was doing the giro knowing full well he wouldn't ... this is a weird one, either rank stupidity or perhaps he thought it being the vuelta he would get away with it. They will probably blame Spanish salbutamol asthma medication.
Difficult to believe either one really isn't it?
I guess we just have to wait and see what the excuses Sky come out with look like, and then we can take a view on wether or not they're any more or less plausible than the 2 options you present.
I'm guessing plenty of people will have already made up their minds on this one though without needing to see what Sky come out with. Can't fault this really with all the anti trust that they bought upon themselves with the whole jiffy bag sags.
yaco said:What's more concerning for me is the offence was after stage 18, while it was stage 17 to Muchacho's in which Froome struggled - Colour me cynical but there is a pattern with Sky in the last few years.
Wasn't there a joruno who a few years ago took EPO tried the tests and passed them?WheelofGear said:So Salbutamol is heroin of performance enhancing drugs? More effective than "oldschool drugs" like EPO and blood doping?
I’m just glad that it’s come during a BIG win, because it takes out the “we were only keeping up” defence.The Hitch said:I made up my mind years ago. Don't care what Sky come up with. Just hope he loses the Vuelta - and thus becomes even more taintedbrownbobby said:bigcog said:No wonder he said he was doing the giro knowing full well he wouldn't ... this is a weird one, either rank stupidity or perhaps he thought it being the vuelta he would get away with it. They will probably blame Spanish salbutamol asthma medication.
Difficult to believe either one really isn't it?
I guess we just have to wait and see what the excuses Sky come out with look like, and then we can take a view on wether or not they're any more or less plausible than the 2 options you present.
I'm guessing plenty of people will have already made up their minds on this one though without needing to see what Sky come out with. Can't fault this really with all the anti trust that they bought upon themselves with the whole jiffy bag sags.
hrotha said:I'm a bit baffled by the comments along the lines of "Froome knew he'd be tested so why would he take it as a PED?".
Surely, if nobody miscalculated no one of note would ever get caught.
WheelofGear said:What are they going to do without Froome?
Thomas for Giro, Kwai for Tour and Poels/Henao for Vuelta?
It might be as simple as using it strictly as a PED for much of your career, then forgetting you had already taken your dose that morning and doubling it by mistake.brownbobby said:hrotha said:I'm a bit baffled by the comments along the lines of "Froome knew he'd be tested so why would he take it as a PED?".
Surely, if nobody miscalculated no one of note would ever get caught.
I think there's a difference to the majority of people who get caught here. Taking a risk with game changing PED's, out of competition and then being caught out by random OOC testing, miscalculating half life's or underestimating how good testing is for certain types of PED's is one thing.
Taking a drug that you're very familiar with, one for which testing protocols are very well known and established knowing that you're 100% certain to be tested the next day, is entirely different.
PremierAndrew said:So, Sky, zero tolerance would mean terminating Froomes contract, right?
jsem94 said:He's Kenyan again, never was British lmao.
Red Rick said:Froome supposedy had 2000mg. Maximum concentration found after inhalation was 1400mg. Definitely not inhalation by FroomeWiggo's Package said:Could the high reading be because the Froome Dog took salbutamol by another method (injection, orally) for performance benefit under cover of the asthma excuse BS?
heart_attack_man said:Nicosix said:kosmonaut said:How many puffs would you need to take to reach 2000ng/ml?
Must've been a really big effort coming up since he "only uses it before big efforts".
The limit of 1000 ng/ml in the urine is calculated for 16 puffs (16!!!!!)
Froome took at least twice that dose!
Woah. Most asthmatics I know take 2, sometimes 3 max. I could see an athlete taking more, but 32???
Wiggo's Package said:WheelofGear said:What are they going to do without Froome?
Thomas for Giro, Kwai for Tour and Poels/Henao for Vuelta?
G a happy man this morning...?