better stick to Sky Sports 1,2,3,4,5 or Times along with a couple of one liners for The Sun.Granville57 said:For the life of me, I can't imagine where such rumors could have originated.![]()
better stick to Sky Sports 1,2,3,4,5 or Times along with a couple of one liners for The Sun.Granville57 said:For the life of me, I can't imagine where such rumors could have originated.![]()
Funny thatCarlo Algatrensig said:I haven't read the whole thread so I don't know if anything about Froome and TUE's has been mentioned. An interview with him has been played on 5Live tonight and he was asked about whether he had any. He said he didn't but I found it a bit odd that he was questioned specifically about them as if there might be some rumors that he actually does have some.
Good, I hope they keep thinking like this.BYOP88 said:Chris Froome on @bbc5live says he & Team Sky have already beaten Contador so: "I don't think we have to be worried about him"..
The arrogance of these guys is amazing. It is like Armstrong when he knew he had UCI protection plus the best doping program.BYOP88 said:Chris Froome on @bbc5live says he & Team Sky have already beaten Contador so: "I don't think we have to be worried about him"..
Perhaps they think we're cows, and we need to keep eating the same regurgitated mess over and over again.the sceptic said:The cycling media is still very much omerta. Everyone is printing that ridiculous badzilla story like its gospel and a perfectly reasonable explanation for why Froome is the new Riis.
My heart would love to see Dan Martin do something special (I know, i know...)thehog said:Even though you have me on ignore I will admit. I love it.
Sans Dawg and there would be no comedy value at this Tour.
The only question. How genius will the Dawg go?
"Alberto Contador is a changed man"BroDeal said:I wish I could say I am looking forward to laughing at the crap that is sure to be spewed by Liggett, but I don't intend to watch this joke of a Tour so I won't hear it first hand anyway.
Yeah...I can't get my finger down my throat fast enough. Utter shamelessness!Granville57 said:And here I didn't think CN could disgrace themselves any further.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/chris-froome-from-cycling-slum-dog-to-monte-carlo-millionaire
It reads like something forwarded directly from Froome's family members. WTF kind of article is that?
So instead, he had to settle for Michelle? Bet she's thrilled by that assessment.
Was that bit for comic relief?
LOL! If that's not trolling...
Such a lack of bias.
That's real journalism right there, kids.
FFS, what an absurd piece.
Nah, me neither. Think I'll go dust the cobwebs off my bike and go for a ride. Something us Sky hating, badzilla loving, unicorn killers don't ever do.BroDeal said:I wish I could say I am looking forward to laughing at the crap that is sure to be spewed by Liggett, but I don't intend to watch this joke of a Tour so I won't hear it first hand anyway.
Yes - I think more than a few of us are of the same opinion. Legal, but pushing the envelope - watching the letter rather than the spirit of the rules - and likely expensive.Heckler said:. . .
I believe one of the biggest issues is that if it is not 100% natural, it is probably 100% legal within the existing rules. It is also Very Expensive.
I know! It's absolutely terrrible!Granville57 said:And here I didn't think CN could disgrace themselves any further.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/chris-froome-from-cycling-slum-dog-to-monte-carlo-millionaire
I called it fluff, but it's much worse. It's inventive fluff propoganda!Granville57 said:It reads like something forwarded directly from Froome's family members. WTF kind of article is that?![]()
Well, she's not a model. I guess he settled for something he could ignore?Granville57 said:So instead, he had to settle for Michelle? Bet she's thrilled by that assessment.
I'm still laughing, it's just that bad.Granville57 said:Was that bit for comic relief?
LOL! If that's not trolling...
Such a lack of bias.
That's real journalism right there, kids.
FFS, what an absurd piece.
You people are such f**king evil haterz and have no life and don't love bikes or racing and ...veganrob said:Nah, me neither. Think I'll go dust the cobwebs off my bike and go for a ride. Something us Sky hating, badzilla loving, unicorn killers don't ever do.
Which products are you alluding towards?armchairclimber said:It gets trickier when there are products which do much the same thing as AICAR that aren't on the WADA banned list. If it's not banned, it's not doping?
i have speculated complete transparency, truth/honesty.horsinabout said:Woops...reached saturation scepticism point, beyond the point of no return! And depending on your world view constructs, this is where you start to calculate by how much you are being cheated
None of the articles or interviews with Sky and Froome have they actually stated they are not doping. And it might be because of all the above and this...
"He wisely hired a serious agent to manage his interests and secure his role as Team leader for Team Sky at the 2013 Tour de France". [url=http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/chris-froome-from-cycling-slum-dog-to-monte-carlo-millionaire]http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/chr ... illionaire[/url]
All the stuff I read on these threads about current confessions by past dopers, and are they bad guys or nice guys arguments rattle on.
One thing is all past and present dopers have one similarity in common...they sell their souls to the devil, reluctantly or otherwise.
The devil? Doping is a pretty sordid affair, but there are far more evil things afoot in this worldhorsinabout said:One thing is all past and present dopers have one similarity in common...they sell their souls to the devil, reluctantly or otherwise.
That way they ride the glory story- slumdog makes good -all the way to the top. Then suddenly a kid shouts out 'the king is a naked oaf!' and its another gravy train all the way back down to a Lance type ground zero.the sceptic said:The cycling media is still very much omerta. Everyone is printing that ridiculous badzilla story like its gospel and a perfectly reasonable explanation for why Froome is the new Riis.