Surely all the better; if he's doping and has now angered the peleton, all the more likely he'll be 'ratted' out, right?Fearless Greg Lemond said:So, it looks like the Froomster has cracked a little under pressure, pointing fingers. That will fall well in the peloton.
For some ridiculous bigotted reason, i have a natural immunity to the charm of saffer accents. I just can't warm to them - not rugby, not cricket, nothing.Fearless Greg Lemond said:Do you feel him growing on you MV? I am.
It's called mass hypn...
Gonna get me an Oakley, a white one.
We all have our crosses to bearH2OUUP2 said:Easy on the Saffa women. I'm married to one.
And still that clean guy netting Armstrong-times over cols is smashing those dirty dopers.Hugh Januss said:No analysis of Valverde's body language?
I had to go look at the Movistar thread, started incidentally (?) by one of the muppets who is defending Froome everywhere else, I can offer a brief synopsis to spare anyone who hasn't read it yet the 5 minute waste of their life.
OP wonders why after yesterdays stage there is nota lot of conjecture about Movistar doping.
Everyone else says "oh yeah, Movistar is doping".
That is one LA tactic that I doubt Froome wants to emulatexrayvision said:All in good time, the guy just started, but he´s on his way, he just got the blue stamp from ASO, next is UCI and the ball is rolling, so yes, it´s just a matter of time.
It should become you well, as a fanboy you must be pleased.
You might not take them seriously but High Road and Garmin both used watts/kg as part of their internal testing program. They are a central part of Sky's training.EnacheV said:those claims like "a human can only go up to xxx watts/kg" are ********, that's why no serious official organization takes them seriously.
ffs, they cant even measure those watts/kg numbers right, put 3 machines on same bike and you get +/- 15% differences between them
LTD is not a shock to me. Old school like Voigt etc.pmcg76 said:Yes, Mollema is not a huge shock though he is riding very well but nothing amazing. Ten Dam however is a shock to me, I always thought of him as a good rider but not at this level. His surprise result got lost in the Froome hysteria.
faster than lance 2003, slower than lance 2001.Cimber said:It turns out that Froome actually went FASTER than Lance in 2003
who said anything else?Cimber said:It turns out that Froome actually went FASTER than Lance in 2003
Yep, TeamSkyFans United are funny as hell. Should we rename JournalVelo into Facts4Sky? FactsForChris? FactsForJesusDontOverdoItChris? He doesnt even see the timing of the climb was at 1.1K to the finishline...jens_attacks said:who said anything else?
the site is ridiculous though slamming vetoo's work. check on dimspace too defending froomey like a real team sky supporter. i love this shiit